2005
DOI: 10.1038/437476a
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Re-wilding: no need for exotics as natives return

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2012
2012

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Two criticisms are negative impacts on native biodiversity and incompatibility with human community structures (Shay 2005; Smith 2005). Others argue the measure is unnecessary because native megafaunal recovery and reintroduction in North America (i.e., bison [ Bison bison ]) is succeeding and restoring wild ecosystems (Dinerstein & Irvin 2005; Schlapher 2005). We argue that a major oversight in the rewilding proposal, as well as other approaches focused on restoring native herbivores, is neglecting to address historic disturbance regimes important to the evolution of flora and fauna in many grassland and savanna ecosystems.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Two criticisms are negative impacts on native biodiversity and incompatibility with human community structures (Shay 2005; Smith 2005). Others argue the measure is unnecessary because native megafaunal recovery and reintroduction in North America (i.e., bison [ Bison bison ]) is succeeding and restoring wild ecosystems (Dinerstein & Irvin 2005; Schlapher 2005). We argue that a major oversight in the rewilding proposal, as well as other approaches focused on restoring native herbivores, is neglecting to address historic disturbance regimes important to the evolution of flora and fauna in many grassland and savanna ecosystems.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, particular aspects of translocation, such as disease screening, captivity, transport and release, can be stressful and increase the overall vulnerability of individuals, thereby decreasing the probability that the population will become self-sustaining [20] , [22] and ultimately the effectiveness of ecological replacements in restoring functional processes. All this raises ethical questions as to whether animals should be used in ecological replacements [23] and, since translocations can be expensive [13] , whether limited financial resources can justifiably be used on such programmes rather than reintroducing native species and protecting nature reserves [24] , [25] , [26] ?…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Whilst it is important to consider all four population processes (birth, death, immigration and emigration) that influence whether a population is self-sustaining [35] , we focus solely on births and deaths as immigration and emigration to and from these small islands is controlled and manipulated by humans. Furthermore, since there are many demands on conservation budgets [36] , and it has been argued that finances should be directed to reintroducing native species [24] , [25] , [26] , we report on the cost of each translocation as recommended by Fischer and Lindenmayer [13] .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%