2020
DOI: 10.1007/s11930-020-00293-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Re-thinking the Zero Tolerance Approach to FGM/C: the Debate Around Female Genital Cosmetic Surgery

Abstract: Purpose of Review To examine the ‘zero tolerance’ policy for female genital cutting (FGM/C) in the international health community in light of the growing popularity of FGCS (female genital cosmetic surgery) worldwide. Recent Findings ‘Traditional’ FGM/C performed in Egypt and Sudan and cosmetic labiaplasty performed in Europe, the Americas, and Antipodes by medically trained gynaecologists and plastic surgeons are based on similar aesthetic logics: labia m… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
17
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 92 publications
0
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The WHO conceptualizes "female genital mutilation" (FGM) as all non-therapeutic cutting, however slight, of the external genitalia of (non-intersex) 4 females-irrespective of the individual's consent-and categorically condemns such cutting as a violation of the human right to bodily integrity. However, the WHO has exclusively sought to eliminate medically unnecessary female genital cutting (FGC) practices that are customary in parts of the Global South, while ignoring comparable practices that are common in the Global North, such as elective labiaplasty (see Table 1) which is increasingly performed on adolescent girls (Liao et al, 2012;Runacres and Wood, 2016;Boddy, 2020).…”
Section: Mapping Inconsistenciesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The WHO conceptualizes "female genital mutilation" (FGM) as all non-therapeutic cutting, however slight, of the external genitalia of (non-intersex) 4 females-irrespective of the individual's consent-and categorically condemns such cutting as a violation of the human right to bodily integrity. However, the WHO has exclusively sought to eliminate medically unnecessary female genital cutting (FGC) practices that are customary in parts of the Global South, while ignoring comparable practices that are common in the Global North, such as elective labiaplasty (see Table 1) which is increasingly performed on adolescent girls (Liao et al, 2012;Runacres and Wood, 2016;Boddy, 2020).…”
Section: Mapping Inconsistenciesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Numerous scholars have argued that this selective focus reflects moral double standards rooted in racism and cultural imperialism (Gunning, 1991;Obiora, 1996;Tangwa, 1999;Ahmadu, 2000Ahmadu, , 2007Ahmadu, , 2016bMason, 2001;Shweder, 2002Shweder, , 2013Njambi, 2004;Ehrenreich and Barr, 2005;Oba, 2008;Dustin, 2010;Smith, 2011;Kelly and Foster, 2012;Boddy, 2016Boddy, , 2020Onsongo, 2017;Shahvisi, 2017Shahvisi, , 2021Shahvisi and Earp, 2019). Some have therefore called on the WHO to revise its policy: either by including Western-associated 5 so-called "cosmetic" female genital surgeries in the campaign against "FGM" (Esho, 2022), or by establishing an age limit or consent criterion for FGC to be applied without discrimination or favor (Dustin,3 For the purposes of this paper, an intervention to alter a bodily state is medically necessary "when (1) the bodily state poses a serious, time-sensitive threat to the person's well-being, typically due to a functional impairment in an associated somatic process, and (2) the intervention, as performed without delay, is the least harmful feasible means of changing the bodily state to one that alleviates the threat" (BCBI, 2019) (p. 18).…”
Section: Mapping Inconsistenciesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…economically flourishing societies. (3) The number of registered labiaplasties in the U.S.A., for example, has increased seven-fold over the last decade, from 2142 in 2011 to 14,386 in 2020. (4) Parallel to the increase, a variety of labiaplasty techniques have been developed, presented, and reflected on.…”
Section: Accepted Manuscriptmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…al., 2019;Rodenhizer & Edwards, 2019;Shor, 2019;Waterman et al, 2022). For example, girls may experience body-image difficulties impacting their self-esteem due to perceived decreased desirability (Boddy, 2020;Dogan & Yassa, 2019;Paslakis et al, 2022;Rasmussen et al, 2015). Dogan and Yassa (2019) examined the motivating factors of 71 women who sought vulvar cosmetic surgery to improve their genital appearance.…”
Section: Perceived Realismmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Girls have been found to be negatively compared with female pornography performers by their boyfriends. It is concerning that labiaplasty is undertaken on girls as young as 13 years as a result of adolescent genital dissatisfaction, which is a growing trend worldwide (Boddy, 2020). Vandenbosch et al (2018) in a longitudinal study in the Netherlands with 1,022 adolescents with a mean age of 15.13 years (53.8% were boys and 46.2% were girls), investigated attitudes and sexual behaviours related to pornography use.…”
Section: Perceived Realismmentioning
confidence: 99%