2019
DOI: 10.1111/anti.12525
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Re‐scripting Place: Managing Social Class Stigma in a Former Steel‐Making Region

Abstract: Following the closure of the steelworks in Teesside, North‐East England, this paper focuses upon social class inequality and the re‐scripting of place. The study explores local responses to programmes such as Benefits Street and Location, Location, Location filmed in Middlesbrough. The study contributes to transnational debates on urban territorial stigmatisation in three ways. First, by extending the gaze from “spectacular” sites of multi‐ethnic urban unrest, to consider seemingly “mundane” post‐industrial pe… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
48
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 62 publications
(54 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
3
48
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Moreover, in negotiating territorial stigma, the materiality of place was found to play an important role. Residents in the newly constructed housing projects mobilised the built environment to re‐inscribe place as an ordinary, suburban neighbourhood (Cairns ; Nayak ), functioning as an additional identity marker that served to distance them from negative cultural stereotypes. In this respect, the benefits of urban renewal are clearly unequally distributed: not only is stigma often used by governing actors to justify area‐based interventions, displacing social renters and attracting more affluent residents (De Koning ; Kipfer ; Tissot ; Tyler and Slater ), these new residents also disproportionally benefit from material improvements because it enables them to develop counter‐narratives against blemish of place.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Moreover, in negotiating territorial stigma, the materiality of place was found to play an important role. Residents in the newly constructed housing projects mobilised the built environment to re‐inscribe place as an ordinary, suburban neighbourhood (Cairns ; Nayak ), functioning as an additional identity marker that served to distance them from negative cultural stereotypes. In this respect, the benefits of urban renewal are clearly unequally distributed: not only is stigma often used by governing actors to justify area‐based interventions, displacing social renters and attracting more affluent residents (De Koning ; Kipfer ; Tissot ; Tyler and Slater ), these new residents also disproportionally benefit from material improvements because it enables them to develop counter‐narratives against blemish of place.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This counter‐narrative provides them with hope and a sense of agency to cope with stigma. Similarly, based on his study of a stigmatised former industrial town in North‐East England, Nayak (:944) concludes that residents may “speak back to dominant regimes of representation” by re‐inscribing place with more positive meanings.…”
Section: Resident Experiences Of Territorial Stigmamentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…You won't get it, you won't get it at all round here. (Darren, aged 21) I am not working at the moment [March 2019]. No one will be hiring at the moment because it's so dead.…”
Section: Precarious Work: Waiting Serving and Labouringmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Always economically relatively precarious as tourism is a seasonal trade, largely reliant on low-wage labour (Beatty and Fothergill, 2004), their economies suffered from the rapid growth of cheap foreign travel from the 1970s (Gale, 2005; Rickey, 2009; Rickey and Houghton, 2009; Shaw and Williams, 1997; Walton, 2000), although economic change and decline varies by location and time, as specific coastal resorts are differentially affected. Resorts in north Devon, for example, suffered from the closure of branch railway lines in the 1960s, whereas on the north-east coast, the closure of the steel works on Teesside in 2015 severely affected resorts already in trouble (Nayak, 2019). More generally, low levels of investment, rising poverty, housing problems as large Victorian properties, previously occupied by visitors, need maintenance (Smith, 2012; Ward, 2015), problems of high rates of drug abuse, community issues connected to recent government policies of housing refugees and asylum seekers in these towns and outward migration of the more educated population have resulted in the coincidence of high levels of social and economic deprivation (House of Lords, 2019; Reid and Westergaard, 2017).…”
Section: Seaside Imagesmentioning
confidence: 99%