Re-Produktionsketten als Ansatz ko-evolutionärer Regionalwirtschaft

Yildiz, Özgür; Drießen, Felix; Pobloth, Sonja; Schön, Susanne

doi:10.14512/oew.v27i1.1179

Cited by 5 publications

(3 citation statements)

References 2 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…Zum einen wird (Re)Produktivität in transdisziplinären oder anwendungsorientierten Studien für einen gut abgrenzbaren Teilbereich gesellschaftlicher Naturverhältnisse in den Mittelpunkt gestellt und dann mit bestehenden Methoden analysiert (vgl. Yildiz et al 2012;Schön et al 2013;Yildiz & Schön 2014;Brüll 2015). Beispielsweise erfolgt die Analyse von RePro-Ketten 4 in Schön et al (2013) unter Nutzung des von Biesecker & Hofmeister (vgl.…”

Section: Bestehende Methodiken (Re)produktionstheoretischer Forschungunclassified

Sozial-ökologische Krise und kollektives Landeigentum

Dannenberg¹

2021

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

Section: Bestehende Methodiken (Re)produktionstheoretischer Forschungunclassified

Sozial-ökologische Krise und kollektives Landeigentum

Dannenberg¹

2021

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Examples that would make the integrative concept of sustainability tangible for practitioners in the process include environmental protection concepts, corporate social responsibility standards, a local climate action plan, the European Energy Award and other quality management systems. It may also be helpful in this context to adapt for practical use scientific-theoretical sustainability approaches such as the concept of re-productivity in an intermediate step, and to prepare such approaches for practical implementation in the real world (Yildiz et al 2012).…”

Section: Regarding Normativitymentioning

confidence: 99%

Real-World Laboratories Initiated by Practitioner Stakeholders for Sustainable Land Management—Characteristics and Challenges Using the Example of Energieavantgarde Anhalt

Kanning

Richter-Harm

Scurrell³

et al. 2020

Human-Environment Interactions

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Real-world laboratories have gained substantially in importance as a format in sustainability and transformation research in recent years in Germany. This increase in significance is associated with the expectation of fostering and experimentally investigating transformations towards sustainability under real-world conditions in a bid to gain knowledge of their dynamics, to identify characteristics of successful transformation processes, and to be able to transfer this knowledge to other cases. Real-world laboratories are usually managed by a scientific partner, enabling use to be made of established procedures and methods in areas such as knowledge integration. Where responsibility for coordinating real-world laboratories lies with practitioner stakeholders, there is promising potential for their deployment. However, it also gives rise to situations, processes and challenges that are new to all parties involved and that have yet to be explored. In principle, experimental approaches that are characteristic of real-world laboratories are not new in the field of sustainable land management and spatial development. However, they are not traditionally alluded to as the real-world For reasons of readability and simplicity, no use is made of the masculine and feminine form when referring to people or job titles in this publication. However, all genders are implied at all times.

show abstract

“…Unter wirtschaftlich-sozialen Gesichtspunkten sol-len dabei entlang eines Wertschöpfungsprozesses möglichst viele, primär lokal verankerte, öffentliche und private Akteur/ innen aus Wirtschaft, Zivilgesellschaft und Verwaltung miteinander kooperieren. Hiervon ausgehend sind für den ländlichen Raum verschiedene Konzepte für Wertschöpfungsketten erarbeitet worden, die bislang ungenutzte oder nur wenig genutzte Sekundärressourcen wie zum Beispiel Waldrestholz oder Abwärme in nachhaltige Versorgungskonzepte überführen (Yildiz et al 2012).…”

unclassified