Proceedings of the 1996 ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work - CSCW '96 1996
DOI: 10.1145/240080.240193
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Re-place-ing space

Abstract: Many collaborative and communicative environments use notions of "space" and spatial organisation to facilitate and structure interaction. We argue that a focus on spatial models is misplaced. Drawing on understandings from architecture and urban design, as well as from our own research findings, we highlight the critical distinction between "space" and "place". While designers use spatial models to support interaction, we show how it is actually a notion of "place" which fram-es interactive behaviour. This le… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
66
0
1

Year Published

1998
1998
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
5
5

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 808 publications
(101 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
2
66
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Robots also have well-defined physical manifestations, can exhibit physical movements and can autonomously interact within peoples' personal spaces, properties that set them apart from other technological artifacts such as a PC or microwave [59]. Further, the tangible nature of robots, and their ability to autonomously move and act in proximity of personal spaces [22,37], is considered to have a unique effect on the social structures surrounding interaction [43]. As such, the way in which people apply social rules to robots, and the extent of this application, can be expected to be different than for other computational technologies.…”
Section: Robots Encourage Social Interactionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Robots also have well-defined physical manifestations, can exhibit physical movements and can autonomously interact within peoples' personal spaces, properties that set them apart from other technological artifacts such as a PC or microwave [59]. Further, the tangible nature of robots, and their ability to autonomously move and act in proximity of personal spaces [22,37], is considered to have a unique effect on the social structures surrounding interaction [43]. As such, the way in which people apply social rules to robots, and the extent of this application, can be expected to be different than for other computational technologies.…”
Section: Robots Encourage Social Interactionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On-line recording and logging were not performed due to privacy concerns. To investigate personal distance, I was interested to what extent the notion of space in the physical environment, and the corresponding behavioural expectations [8], transfer into a virtual environment. The following behaviours were coded: 1) Does a social distance exist during conversations?…”
Section: Methodological Approach and Research Settingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[11,25,52]). This research field has led to multiple studies within CCI of how Ubiquitous Computing can support engaging and enhanced learning environments for new generations.…”
Section: The Ecological Turnmentioning
confidence: 99%