2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.neucom.2018.11.009
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Re-KISSME: A robust resampling scheme for distance metric learning in the presence of label noise

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Since the computed score is greater than the statistical value, the null hypothesis is rejected. Furthermore, by applying the Iman-Davenport test [36], the null hypothesis is also rejected as the calculated value is greater than the critical value at the same significance level. These statistical results denote that there are significant differences between the effectiveness of the presented methods.…”
Section: Convergence Ratesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since the computed score is greater than the statistical value, the null hypothesis is rejected. Furthermore, by applying the Iman-Davenport test [36], the null hypothesis is also rejected as the calculated value is greater than the critical value at the same significance level. These statistical results denote that there are significant differences between the effectiveness of the presented methods.…”
Section: Convergence Ratesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this part, the mean execution values related to the different optimization criteria are sorted to assess the best operating one according to its average objective function performance. Moreover, a statistical comparison based on the nonparametric Friedman and Bonferroni-Dunn is carried out by using these mean performances [30,31]. The average ranks for all the proposed methods based on the four performances indices are provided in Table 6.…”
Section: Statistical Analysis and Comparisonmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since the above computed score is greater than this statistical value, the null hypothesis is declined. Moreover, for the Iman-Davenport test [30,31], the statistic is distributed with m − 1 = 5 and (m − 1) × (l − 1) = 15 degrees of freedom. For this test, the null hypothesis is also rejected as the calculated value F F = 4.64 is greater than the critical value F 5,15,0.05 = 2.9 at the same significant level of confidence.…”
Section: Statistical Analysis and Comparisonmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Kissmetric is a data analysis model that can be used for customer engagement. The data analysis of this platform can help users understand customer engagement, analyze product performance, and determine whether the customized marketing plan is effective [6][7]. However, Kissmetric contains a large amount of data, and users may not be able to quickly obtain effective information from it.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%