2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.amsu.2021.102703
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Re-intervention rate in endovascular vs open surgical repair for abdominal aortic aneurysms

Abstract: A best evidence topic has been constructed using a described protocol. The three-part question addressed was: In patients with Infrarenal abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA), Does endovascular abdominal aortic repair (EVAR), AS compared to open surgical repair (OSR), has lower re-intervention rates? The outcomes assessed were the re-interventional rates in both techniques. The best evidence showed that the OSR has lower statistically significant difference rates in re-intervention rates than the EVAR.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The surgeon and hospital volume of open TAAA repairs has decreased considerably over the last two decades, subsequently leading to increased numbers of centers offering endovascular repair ( 18 ). However, the endovascular TAAA repair is associated with higher rates of re-intervention ( 19 , 20 ), and increased early expenses ( 21 ). Open repair was performed in limited centers, and always performed in these conditions: complex aortic pathology, unsuitable for endovascular repair, and most reported open repairs were performed in high volume centers with an experienced surgical team ( 15 , 18 ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The surgeon and hospital volume of open TAAA repairs has decreased considerably over the last two decades, subsequently leading to increased numbers of centers offering endovascular repair ( 18 ). However, the endovascular TAAA repair is associated with higher rates of re-intervention ( 19 , 20 ), and increased early expenses ( 21 ). Open repair was performed in limited centers, and always performed in these conditions: complex aortic pathology, unsuitable for endovascular repair, and most reported open repairs were performed in high volume centers with an experienced surgical team ( 15 , 18 ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Эндоваскулярное протезирование брюшного отдела аорты является методом первого выбора для пациентов с благоприятной анатомией аорты и пациентов с выраженной отягощенностью коморбидной патологией. Несмотря на успехи в технологии эндоваскулярного протезирования брюшного отдела аорты, процедура EVAR сопровождается почти пятикратным увеличением 30-дневной частоты реинтервенций по сравнению с открытыми операциями: 9,8 % в исследовании EVAR I и 18 % -в EVAR II [9]. Реинтервенции на инфраренальном отделе аорты показаны при увеличении аневризмы при наличии или отсутствии эндолика, миграции или отсоединении модулей стент-графта, тромбозе тела эндопротеза или его браншей, инфекции зоны эндопротеза и разрыве аневризмы.…”
Section: результаты и обсуждениеunclassified