2015
DOI: 10.13075/ijomeh.1896.00478
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Re-initiating professional working activity after myocardial infarction in primary percutaneous coronary intervention networks era

Abstract: Objectives: To investigate the aspects of return to work, socio-economic and quality of life aspects in 145 employed patients under 60 years of age treated with primary percutaneous coronary intervention for acute ST-elevation myocardial infarction. Material and Methods: During hospital treatment demographic and clinical data was collected. Data about major adverse cardiovascular events, rehabilitation, sick leave, discharge from job and retirement, salary, major life events and estimation of quality of life a… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

2
19
0
1

Year Published

2017
2017
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
2
19
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Not only does this population have higher rates of morbidity and mortality following MI they are also more likely to fail to regain their previous quality of life. Lower-SES patients are more likely to develop frailty (61), lose their independence (62), have limited functional recovery (63), and are less likely to successfully return to work following their MI (64), all negative outcomes that are ameliorated with participation in CR (9, 65). Overall these findings paint a picture of a high-risk population with myriad challenges in need of intensive intervention post-MI.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Not only does this population have higher rates of morbidity and mortality following MI they are also more likely to fail to regain their previous quality of life. Lower-SES patients are more likely to develop frailty (61), lose their independence (62), have limited functional recovery (63), and are less likely to successfully return to work following their MI (64), all negative outcomes that are ameliorated with participation in CR (9, 65). Overall these findings paint a picture of a high-risk population with myriad challenges in need of intensive intervention post-MI.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, as a traumatic event, MI could detrimentally affect patients' HRQoL both physically and mentally [16], leading to poor workplace rehabilitation (i.e. delayed return to work, increased sick leave, absence or even termination or resignation) [17]. As observed, patients who returned to work after MI could continuously be affected by impaired heart function (i.e.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…Time of return to work also shapes patients’ perception about difficulties in the family and social environment. Time to return to work seems to vary globally, as in the United States patients return to work after 75 days, while in Europe they return after 3–6 months [ 29 ]. However, the majority of patients return to work in 2 or 3 months with the exception of occupations that involve intense physical requirements.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%