2015
DOI: 10.1111/tran.12102
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Re‐inhabiting no‐man's land: genealogies, political life and critical agendas

Abstract: Use policyThe full-text may be used and/or reproduced, and given to third parties in any format or medium, without prior permission or charge, for personal research or study, educational, or not-for-prot purposes provided that:• a full bibliographic reference is made to the original source • a link is made to the metadata record in DRO • the full-text is not changed in any way The full-text must not be sold in any format or medium without the formal permission of the copyright holders.Please consult the full D… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
18
0
1

Year Published

2015
2015
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 57 publications
0
18
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Due to the enforcement of a 2,600 km 2 “Zone of Alienation” (Зoнa вiдчyжeння Чopнoбильcькoї AEC) around the epicentre, about 350,000 people had to evacuate, and 2.1 million Ukrainians still inhabit land officially designated affected by the accident (Davies & Polese, ). As Leshem and Pinkerton () note, the Ukrainian use of the word “alienation” is particularly fitting in this example of a nuclear zone, as it gives “attention to less visible ruptures in the life fabric of individuals and communities medically and economically affected by the event” (p. 8). Communities are another important site of research into nuclear geography, as will be discussed later.…”
Section: Zonesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Due to the enforcement of a 2,600 km 2 “Zone of Alienation” (Зoнa вiдчyжeння Чopнoбильcькoї AEC) around the epicentre, about 350,000 people had to evacuate, and 2.1 million Ukrainians still inhabit land officially designated affected by the accident (Davies & Polese, ). As Leshem and Pinkerton () note, the Ukrainian use of the word “alienation” is particularly fitting in this example of a nuclear zone, as it gives “attention to less visible ruptures in the life fabric of individuals and communities medically and economically affected by the event” (p. 8). Communities are another important site of research into nuclear geography, as will be discussed later.…”
Section: Zonesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Leshem and Pinkerton's (2016) recent work on the geographies of no man's lands is here of great significance to understand the production of the unregulated spatialities of what Dominique Moran and others have described as 'carceral mobilities' (see, among others, Moran, 2015;Moran, Gill, & Conlon, 2013).…”
Section: Gradisca's No Man's Land: Visible and Invisible Carceral Spamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It does so, on the one hand, by suggesting that this Italian version of exopolis may be better delineated via an aerial view a la Soja (1989); on the other, by interrogating some its most significant and contested spaces-in-between via the concept of no man's land as recently discussed by Leshem and Pinkerton (2016). In particular, we focus on the informal no man's land around the Gradisca camp complex used by the asylum seekers in ways that have recently become for many-and in particular for the residents-a somehow disturbing visible and invisible presence in the already unstable self-representations of these once quiet and orderly rural and residential territories.…”
mentioning
confidence: 98%
“…For two months in 2015, we undertook an expedition "Into No-Man's Land" (Leshem and Pinkerton 2015). We travelled more than 6,000 miles from Nomansland Common in rural Hertfordshire in southern England toward the unclaimed desert enclave of Bir Tawil on the Egypt-Sudan border.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%