2018
DOI: 10.1080/13533312.2018.1554442
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Re-Importing the ‘Robust Turn’ in UN Peacekeeping: Internal Public Security Missions of Brazil’s Military

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0
1

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 32 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
0
10
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The state-centric character of stabilisation also has another implication: because of its pragmatic approach, stabilisation brings closer on the one hand Western practices and discourses of post-conflict intervention, and on the other efforts to ensure stability carried out by national governments of states affected by armed violence. Some countries and regional organisations in the Global South (for instance, Brazil and the African Union) have explicitly adopted stabilisation, while also reinterpreting and readapting it, others have developed policies inspired by stabilisation, but avoided using the term (ie Mexico), and still others have crafted the rhetoric of stabilisation on existing domestic COIN policies (Pakistan and Sri Lanka) (Muggah 2013;Dersso 2016;Harig 2019). In spite of this wide range of cases, there are comparatively few studies about how national governments beyond NATO countries adopt, appropriate or contribute to the development of stabilisation doctrines and how this approach shapes peacebuilding outcomes.…”
Section: Reconstructing War-torn States: From Liberal Peacebuilding To 'Stabilisation'?mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The state-centric character of stabilisation also has another implication: because of its pragmatic approach, stabilisation brings closer on the one hand Western practices and discourses of post-conflict intervention, and on the other efforts to ensure stability carried out by national governments of states affected by armed violence. Some countries and regional organisations in the Global South (for instance, Brazil and the African Union) have explicitly adopted stabilisation, while also reinterpreting and readapting it, others have developed policies inspired by stabilisation, but avoided using the term (ie Mexico), and still others have crafted the rhetoric of stabilisation on existing domestic COIN policies (Pakistan and Sri Lanka) (Muggah 2013;Dersso 2016;Harig 2019). In spite of this wide range of cases, there are comparatively few studies about how national governments beyond NATO countries adopt, appropriate or contribute to the development of stabilisation doctrines and how this approach shapes peacebuilding outcomes.…”
Section: Reconstructing War-torn States: From Liberal Peacebuilding To 'Stabilisation'?mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, in spite of these countries' stated commitment to an integrated approach and to use stabilisation to improve the well-being of vulnerable populations, existing research offers evidence supporting the views of those who fear that stabilisation might lead to excessive securitisation. Christoph Harig, for instance, has shown how Brazilian participation in UN stabilisation and the subsequent adoption of stabilisation at home has encouraged the internal deployment of the army for law-and-order purposes (Harig 2019). In investigating the Mexico-US partnership to tackle Mexican drug cartels, Sebastián Albuja argues that, in spite of the inclusive stabilisation approach promised, it has ended up focussing in practice on military action (Albuja 2013, 178).…”
Section: Reconstructing War-torn States: From Liberal Peacebuilding To 'Stabilisation'?mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…De volta para casa, muitos se convenceram de que o exército deveria se engajar em missões similares às da ONU, mas no plano doméstico. Por outro lado, cresce a demanda de missões de "Garantia da Lei e da Ordem" por políticos desejosos de mostrar uma mão dura em todo o país, o que por sua vez, fortaleceu o poder de barganha dos militares (Harig, 2018). Barrado como vice de Bolsonaro por seu partido, Heleno se serve deste repertório para comandar o Gabinete de Segurança da Presidência da República, órgão diretamente vinculado à presidência e responsável pelos serviços de inteligência.…”
Section: C) O Caso Brasileirounclassified
“…At the same time, demand was growing for "guarantee of law and order" missions by politicians willing to wield a heavy hand over the country. This in turn strengthened the military's bargaining power (Harig, 2018). Blocked by his party from becoming Bolsonaro's deputy, Heleno has used his previous experience to command the president's security cabinet, an agency directly linked to the presidency and responsible for intelligence services.…”
Section: Containment As Accelerating Desocialization: the Brazilian Casementioning
confidence: 99%