2008
DOI: 10.1080/01596300802259111
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

(re)Imagining the global, rethinking gender in education

Abstract: This paper develops new lines of analysis for understanding the relationships between globalisation, the imagination and emergent models of the 'girl-citizen'. It begins by outlining a new critical framework for studying globalisation that takes as its object of study not what globalisation is, but what globalisation does. Making use of Foucault's analytics of governmentality, it argues that globalisation can be usefully understood as a complex and contradictory set of movements that establish new modes of reg… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As Burns (2008) has suggested, accounts like these appear to draw on wider hegemonic neoliberal discourse. The ferocious marketing practices taken up in the prospectuses certainly seemed to draw heavily on this type of consumerist logic.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As Burns (2008) has suggested, accounts like these appear to draw on wider hegemonic neoliberal discourse. The ferocious marketing practices taken up in the prospectuses certainly seemed to draw heavily on this type of consumerist logic.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although the concept has gained increased presence in academic literature from a range of disciplinary back grounds, there is no unified definition of the term. Different views in cur rent academic literature reflect dissentions around the notio n of "global" and "globalisation" themselves, a contentious notion in academia, often criticised for being poorly theorised, despite the vast field of academic literature on the topic (Appadurai, 1996;Burns, 2008;Blommaert, 2010;Kamola, 2014;Steger, 2009). The lack of consensus around these notions is reflected in the dichotomies that frame debates around globalisation: in particular, the tension between emancipatory and alienating forms of globalisation (Beck, 2004;Burns, 2008;Welply, 2015, p. 231).…”
Section: What Is Global Citizenship and Why Do We Need It?mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This includes new, transnational and multiple forms of affiliation (Banks, 2014;Appadurai, 1996) which call for reframing existing boundaries and categories (Welply, 2015). As such, imagination gives a new role to globalisation, allowing minoritized groups and individuals to negotiate global cultural trends (Appadurai, 1996;Burns, 2008), critically engage with globalisation (Delanty, 2009, p. 250) or cultivate "shared humanity" or cosmopolitanism through "narrative" or "sympathetic" imagination, as a foundation for global citizenship education (Nussbaum, 1998Appiah, 2006Appiah, , 2017. Here, imagination is not a mere fantasy, nor is it uncritical.…”
Section: For or Against Global Citizenship Education? -Overcoming Dicmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Success in a neoliberal economy requires citizens to be creative, entrepreneurial and businesslike, facilitating a range of self-management strategies to temper the risks associated with the global economy (Burns 2008). While the educational work done by mothers contributes to reproducing the class structure of the affluent community (Griffith and Smith 2005), the self-management strategies employed by entitled-minded mothers further heightens their own individual and family status within that same community.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%