2018
DOI: 10.3828/tpr.2018.23
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Re-imagining neighbourhood governance: the future of neighbourhood planning in England

Abstract: Neighbourhood planning is arguably the most radical innovation in UK local governance in a generation, with over 2,200 communities in England now involved in statutory development planning at the neighbourhood level. Following incremental policy reforms, we argue that neighbourhood planning has reached a critical juncture where the future of the initiative is at stake. In this paper we reflect on existing research to assess the policy to date before imagining what an optimised version of the policy might look … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
25
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
3

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 31 publications
(27 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
2
25
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Later follow-up analysis of the User Experience survey and other research has noted the absence of explicit criteria for success. An agenda for improving policy and practice for neighbourhood planning, 're-imagined' has been produced, which suggests better 'co-production' by the community with the local council (Wargent and Parker 2018).…”
Section: Neighbourhood Planning In England: the User Experience Repormentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Later follow-up analysis of the User Experience survey and other research has noted the absence of explicit criteria for success. An agenda for improving policy and practice for neighbourhood planning, 're-imagined' has been produced, which suggests better 'co-production' by the community with the local council (Wargent and Parker 2018).…”
Section: Neighbourhood Planning In England: the User Experience Repormentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This makes collaborative democracy go beyond the boundaries of representative democracy, which makes collaborative governance an important strategy for managing sustainable cities (Challies et al, 2016;Hamilton & Lubell, 2017). Wargent & Parker (2018) emphasize that principles of collaborative governance, based on the role and leadership of citizens, ground the idea of collaborative democracy. In this sense, Bartoletti & Faccioli (2016) argue that democracy must be inclusive, allowing citizens to participate and collaborate.…”
Section: Collaborative Governancementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Debates on rural governance lend some support to such a move, as they suggest that rural planning ought to err on the side of directly empowering local communities (Dalal-Clayton et al, 2002). Indeed in the UK, a new legitimacy has been given to arguments for local control (Wargent and Parker, 2018) by the introduction of statutory neighbourhood planning in England by the Localism Act (TSO, 2011). Nonetheless, rural planning scholars argue that 'despite an apparent localisation of rural policy delivery, the design of policy -and the framing of its delivery -is occurring at numerous levels and within a variety of different bodies above the point of delivery' (Gallent et al, 2015: 55).…”
Section: The Nsip Regimementioning
confidence: 99%