Phlebology ’95 1995
DOI: 10.1007/978-1-4471-3095-6_219
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Re-Exploration of the Saphenofemoral Junction in the Treatment of Recurrent Varicose Veins

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

2
11
0
3

Year Published

1998
1998
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
2
11
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…(Table 2). According to Viani [24], the true NV is only 1.6%. Complete and meticulous treatment can assure good results consequently.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(Table 2). According to Viani [24], the true NV is only 1.6%. Complete and meticulous treatment can assure good results consequently.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Leaving behind incompetent SFJ and residual GSV stump with tributaries has been regarded in the past as the main cause of varicose vein recurrences; the incidence has been reported to range mostly between 51 and 83% 23,[25][26][27][28][29][30][31][32] ; refluxing residual GSV stumps with tributaries and incompetent SFJ were detected in 68.9, 26 51.0, 27 65.2, 28 83.2, 29 65.0, 30 and 66.0%. 32 New refluxcarrying channels in the groin were documented on venography and duplex ultrasonography (DUS).…”
Section: Imperfectly Performed Crossectomymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Mehrere Autoren fanden als Rezidivursache refluxierende Venenäste in der Nähe der alten saphenofemoralen Ligatur (40,49,68,73,74). Sie suchten deshalb bei jeder Krossektomie die benachbarte Vena femoralis ringsum chirurgisch nach zusätzlichen Ästen ab, insbesondere nach der in bis zu 30% der Fälle vorkommenden Vena pudenda externa profunda.…”
Section: Revision Der Benachbarten Vena Femoralisunclassified