Re‐examining race‐based admissions processes of American institutions of higher education using multi‐dimensional ethical perspectives

Abstract

The Supreme Court of the USA explains when universities may use race‐based admissions policies without violating the Equal Protection Clause of the US Constitution. These rulings raise important ethical issues for universities that are presently using race as a consideration in their admissions decisions. This paper discusses some of the ethical issues presented by the Supreme Court's decisions in the Regents of the University of California v. Bakke, Grutter v. Bollinger, and Gratz v. Bollinger cases. A summary of the Bakke, Grutter, and Gratz cases is provided as well as an analysis of these decisions using an ethical framework that incorporates five perspectives: ethic of critique, ethic of justice, ethic of profession, ethic of care, and ethic of community. The accompanying discussion highlights areas of agreement and conflict between the goals of race‐based university admissions policies and the Bakke, Gratz, and Grutter decisions.

Time and the embodied other in education: A dimension of teachers’ everyday judgements of student learning

“…It needs to be pointed out that efficiency should not be regarded as the opposite to education and ethics, especially as there are a lot of examples in which an effective organisation facilitates learning and sees to it that people are not harmed (Boyd 2004). Yet, what is pointed out from various directions is that a blind cherishing of efficiency risks increasing inequalities in society and creating situations in which individuals are injured behind a cloak of goodwill (Gándara et al 2003;Gutierres and Green 2004;Stefkovich and O'Brian 2004).…”