2012
DOI: 10.1080/1943815x.2011.625951
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Re-examining culture/conservation conflict: the view of anthropology of conservation through the lens of environmental ethics

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0
1

Year Published

2013
2013
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

4
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 51 publications
0
8
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…At present, much of ESD is based on the assumption that social, economic and environmental interests do indeed converge, and that plural ethical perspectives in education are desirable (e.g., [88][89][90][91]). However, while an anthropocentric motivation can produce environmentally positive outcomes in situations where both humans and nonhumans are negatively affected, as in cases of pollution or climate change, anthropocentrism is not enough to protect natural elements that have no utilitarian value [77,81,[92][93][94][95][96][97][98][99]. Critical scholars have argued that mainstream ESD ignores the urgency of environmental problems through the discursive politics of neoliberal ideology of equitable economic growth (e.g., [100][101][102][103][104]).…”
Section: Ecocentric Perspective On Sustainable Developmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…At present, much of ESD is based on the assumption that social, economic and environmental interests do indeed converge, and that plural ethical perspectives in education are desirable (e.g., [88][89][90][91]). However, while an anthropocentric motivation can produce environmentally positive outcomes in situations where both humans and nonhumans are negatively affected, as in cases of pollution or climate change, anthropocentrism is not enough to protect natural elements that have no utilitarian value [77,81,[92][93][94][95][96][97][98][99]. Critical scholars have argued that mainstream ESD ignores the urgency of environmental problems through the discursive politics of neoliberal ideology of equitable economic growth (e.g., [100][101][102][103][104]).…”
Section: Ecocentric Perspective On Sustainable Developmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They are used to emphasize their own moral and cultural superiority. This overlooks ecocentric rationalities that come from rural people and which are used as theoretical validation for 'fortress conservation' on one hand or neoliberal conservation approaches on the other, both excluding rural people (Kopnina 2012b;Kopnina 2012a;Wilshusen et al 2002). For different reasons, academics also criticize anthropologists and theoreticians of conservation for looking for the 'conservationist within' rural people, reinventing the 'noble savage' with inherent ecological moral status (Brosius 1997;Brosius et al 1998;Inglehart 1995;Nadasdy 2005;Waitt 1999).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Though there has been a concerted effort to apply concepts of EJ to human populations, nonhuman animals remain nearly absent from this discourse (Kopnina 2014). Kopnina (2014) argues that scholars are influenced by the "dominant neoliberal ideology of anthropocentrism" (p. 2) (see also, e.g., Callicott 1999;Catton and Dunlap 1978;Crist 2012;Kopnina 2012aKopnina , 2012b. The traditional tendency of social science to be anthropocentric has limited inquiry into animal-environment issues to discussions of the implications of these issues to humans, without regard for the inherent value of animal species (Beirne 2009;Nibert 2002).…”
Section: Environmental Justice and The Place Of Animalsmentioning
confidence: 99%