1986
DOI: 10.1016/0013-7944(86)90022-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Re-examination of cumulative fatigue damage analysis—an engineering perspective

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
82
0
3

Year Published

1991
1991
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 135 publications
(92 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
0
82
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Loading spectrum form is characterized by the diagram filling factor calculated from the formula as follows [7]: (1) which, in relation to the schematic spectrum diagram, is equivalent to the ratio of the areas F 1 (under the block spectrum envelope) to the area of the rectangle having the sides: S amax and n c . As results from the scheme (b) in Fig.…”
Section: Formulation Of the Problemmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Loading spectrum form is characterized by the diagram filling factor calculated from the formula as follows [7]: (1) which, in relation to the schematic spectrum diagram, is equivalent to the ratio of the areas F 1 (under the block spectrum envelope) to the area of the rectangle having the sides: S amax and n c . As results from the scheme (b) in Fig.…”
Section: Formulation Of the Problemmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…in the monographs [1] and [2]. Out of many hypotheses, the oldest hypothesis, most comprehensively verified and commonly used is that based on linear summation of fatigue damages, given by Palmgren and Miner (P-M).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This result is from a lack of the low-range data needed to adjust the shape of the curve during the models conception. To improve the model, Manson and Halford (1986) included a linear term to shift the curves away from the x-axis. The difficulty would be to allow this new term to have a significant influence at low life ratios but negligible effect at higher ratios.…”
Section: Double Damage Curve Approach (Ddca)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Grover (1960) divided the damage growth into two such phases, and then proposed post facto (after examining multi-level load data) damage formulae. The idea of two such phases was adopted and adapted by Manson et al (1967) and Manson & Halford (1981, 1986 into the well-known double linear damage rule (DLDR). The DLDR has been viewed as a credible alternative to Miner's rule.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%