2016
DOI: 10.1515/vzoo-2016-0040
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Re-Evaluation of Morphological Characters Questions Current Views of Pinniped Origins

Abstract: Re-evaluation of Morphological Characters Questions Current Views of Pinniped Origins.Koretsky, I. A., Barnes, L. G., Rahmat, S. J. -Th e origin of pinnipeds has been a contentious issue, with opposite sides debating monophyly or diphyly. Th is review uses evidence from the fossil record, combined with comparative morphology, molecular and cytogenetic investigations to evaluate the evolutionary history and phylogenetic relationships of living and fossil otarioid and phocoid pinnipeds. Molecular investigations … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
35
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
2
2

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 53 publications
(37 citation statements)
references
References 62 publications
2
35
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Th e detailed morphology and discussion of the "pinniped" fl ipper structure was presented by Bininda-Emonds and Russell (1996), who reached a conclusion opposite to Wyss (1994), demonstrating additional support to a likely diphyletic origin. Several of the features discussed in the Koretsky et al (2016) publication directly supported the Bininda-Emonds and Russell (1996) study.…”
supporting
confidence: 58%
“…Th e detailed morphology and discussion of the "pinniped" fl ipper structure was presented by Bininda-Emonds and Russell (1996), who reached a conclusion opposite to Wyss (1994), demonstrating additional support to a likely diphyletic origin. Several of the features discussed in the Koretsky et al (2016) publication directly supported the Bininda-Emonds and Russell (1996) study.…”
supporting
confidence: 58%
“…Within the topology produced by the TEA, we can assume the loss of the alisphenoid canal represents an autapomophy for Potamotherium, rather than a synapomorphy of a hypothetical Potamotherium + Phocidae clade Koretsky and Rahmat, 2016). It is likely the alisphenoid canal was lost multiple times in arctoids, including at least once in phocids, mephitids, the clade containing mustelids + procyonids, and…”
Section: Pinnipedimorph Taxonomymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, this interpretation requires a more comprehensive phylogenetic analysis (Diedrich, 2011;Berta, 2012;Boessenecker and Churchill, 2013;Koretsky and Domning, 2014;Koretsky et al, 2016). In the initial analysis (Rybczynski et al 2009), Puijila was recovered in a clade with Enaliarctos, Potamotherium, and Amphicticeps, thereby supporting the notion Puijila is either a pinniped, a pinnipedimorph, or an earlierdiverging member of this lineage.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 95%
See 2 more Smart Citations