2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.anucene.2011.01.025
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Re-evaluation of Assay Data of Spent Nuclear Fuel obtained at Japan Atomic Energy Research Institute for validation of burnup calculation code systems

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
5
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
2
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The result previously published by Suyama et al for the same benchmark specification but using different methodology based on the SWAT code, shows good agreement for 36 matches (65%) [2]. Hence, the results of MCB modeling in the more accurate way refl ect the physics of the 17G fuel assembly.…”
Section: Comparative Analysissupporting
confidence: 64%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…The result previously published by Suyama et al for the same benchmark specification but using different methodology based on the SWAT code, shows good agreement for 36 matches (65%) [2]. Hence, the results of MCB modeling in the more accurate way refl ect the physics of the 17G fuel assembly.…”
Section: Comparative Analysissupporting
confidence: 64%
“…The similar overestimation but in the range of 3-5% was presented by Suyama et al [2] which indicates to some inconsistencies in the benchmark specifi cation. The most probable reasons for the U-235 overestimation might be: -erroneous measurements of reference U-235 concentrations -the overestimation in U-235 concentrations was observed for MCB and SWAT modeling,…”
Section: U-235mentioning
confidence: 48%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The reference data applied in the analysis are mainly based on the two scientific publications: the paper of T. Adachi et al [1] and the paper of K. Suyama et al [2]. The papers include the comprehensive knowledge about performed post irradiation examination of the spent fuel samples, irradiation history and fuel assembly design.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%