2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2015.03.067
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Re-evaluating the need for hospital admission and observation of pediatric traumatic brain injury after a normal head CT

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Although 5.2% of transfers needed neurosurgical intervention, no such cases were counted among those with isolated, nondisplaced skull fractures or those with negative imaging. It has been previously observed that neurologically intact patients can typically be discharged without hospital admission following observation in the ED after a normal head CT scan 35 or one revealing only an isolated linear skull fracture. 3,39 A review by White et al 47 of 438 patients transferred to a Level I facility for an isolated, linear, nondisplaced skull fracture in the absence of multisystem trauma found that all patients recovered with treatment of symptoms, and none required neurosurgical intervention, leading the authors of that paper to conclude that transfer to a higherlevel trauma facility is not warranted in this population.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although 5.2% of transfers needed neurosurgical intervention, no such cases were counted among those with isolated, nondisplaced skull fractures or those with negative imaging. It has been previously observed that neurologically intact patients can typically be discharged without hospital admission following observation in the ED after a normal head CT scan 35 or one revealing only an isolated linear skull fracture. 3,39 A review by White et al 47 of 438 patients transferred to a Level I facility for an isolated, linear, nondisplaced skull fracture in the absence of multisystem trauma found that all patients recovered with treatment of symptoms, and none required neurosurgical intervention, leading the authors of that paper to conclude that transfer to a higherlevel trauma facility is not warranted in this population.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Hospitalization is not necessary for many children with nondisplaced skull fractures [27] and neurologically normal children with isolated linear skull fractures after minor blunt head trauma [28]. Reducing unnecessary hospitalizations can prevent emotional stress, in addition to saving costs for the child's family and the health care system [29][30][31]. This study has several limitations.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…The healthcare costs associated with pediatric skull fracture patients with CSF leaks have not been well documented in the literature. 6,21 Traumatic CSF leaks are as-sociated with greater hospital and physician expenditures, both at the index hospitalization and at 90 days. However, since average LOSs were longer in the CSF leak cohort than in the non-CSF leak cohort, it is possible that the difference in costs is largely attributable to prolonged admission, 6,21 especially in the intensive care unit.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…6,21 Traumatic CSF leaks are as-sociated with greater hospital and physician expenditures, both at the index hospitalization and at 90 days. However, since average LOSs were longer in the CSF leak cohort than in the non-CSF leak cohort, it is possible that the difference in costs is largely attributable to prolonged admission, 6,21 especially in the intensive care unit. The increased rates of neurosurgical procedures for patients with CSF leaks are also likely contributors to the elevated costs associated with their care.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%