2012
DOI: 10.1080/00438243.2012.727342
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Re-envisioning long-distance Oceanic migration: early dates in the Mariana Islands

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
24
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 40 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
1
24
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These findings now are confirmed for at least two sites in Guam, another two in Tinian, and three in Saipan (Carson and Kurashina 2012). Regarding the decorated pottery, a virtually identical match with the Philippines suggests a largely shared Philippines-Marianas system, whereas significant modifications and elaborations are evident in Lapita assemblages.…”
Section: Seeking the Lapita Homelandsupporting
confidence: 66%
“…These findings now are confirmed for at least two sites in Guam, another two in Tinian, and three in Saipan (Carson and Kurashina 2012). Regarding the decorated pottery, a virtually identical match with the Philippines suggests a largely shared Philippines-Marianas system, whereas significant modifications and elaborations are evident in Lapita assemblages.…”
Section: Seeking the Lapita Homelandsupporting
confidence: 66%
“…Therefore, radiocarbon determinations on Anadara sp. do not support the existence of an older cultural assemblage at Bapot‐1 dating to 3562–3508 calBP (1612–1558 BC), as suggested by Carson (), Carson and Kurashina () and Carson (). Instead, our Bayesian 14 C model suggests human arrival at Bapot‐1 around 3200–3080 calBP (1250–1140 BC).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 65%
“…This age range is based on three radiocarbon ( 14 C) determinations on Anadara sp. shellfish (Carson & Kurashina : 430) that were rejected by Clark et al . () because they were older than results on charcoal and other marine shell species from comparable deposits.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In these island groups, the earliest discrete settlement period (hereafter the Early Period) is marked by the dominance of nearshore marine subsistence over horticulture, by settlements located in places where access to these resources was optimal and, in many groups, the existence of a distinctive material culture, including manufacture of intricately decorated pots, shell jewellery and perhaps woodcarving and tattooing; the maritime abilities of these first settlers are selfevident (Carson, 2011;Carson and Kurashina, 2012;Green, 2003). In the tropical South Pacific, the name 'Lapita' is used to refer to the distinct culture of settlers during the Early Period.…”
Section: Case Study 1: End Of Early Period Societies In Western Pacifmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Similarities in lifestyle are attributable to interactions with similar environments. The earliest settlement period in the Marianas is marked by manufacture of decorated (not Lapita) pottery commencing about 3,500-3,300 cal bp and becoming rare after 2,700-2,500 cal bp (Carson, 2008(Carson, , 2012Carson and Kurashina, 2012).…”
Section: Case Study 1: End Of Early Period Societies In Western Pacifmentioning
confidence: 99%