The spin-1 Ising (BEG) model has been simulated using a cellular au- where the I λν ij describes the interaction between species λ and ν on sites i and j, respectively. Second term in Eq. (1) describes the binding energy.The irrelevant terms are included in H 0 . If site i is occupied by species λ, P λ i is equal to 1, and zero otherwise. This energy definition is also valid for the ternary alloys [6]. This model can be related to spin-1 Ising model by the following transformations:The three components of the spin variables S i are related with each species of atoms: S i = −1 (A), +1 (B) and 0 (C) for the ((AB) 1−x C 2x ) ternary alloys or S i = 0 (Cu) and ±1 (Au) for Cu-Au type alloys. The Hamiltonian is then equivalent to the spin-1 Ising Hamiltonian J, K, L, D , h and H / 0 are bilinear , biquadratic , dipol-quadrupol interaction terms, single-ion anisotropy constant, the field term and irrelevant terms, respectively. < ij > denotes summation over all nearest-neighbor (nn) pairs of sites.
Results and discussionThe simulations have been performed on the face-centered cubic lattice 5 for linear dimension L= 9 with periodic boundary conditions using heating algorithm (The total number of sites is N = 4L 3 ). This algorithm is realized by increasing of 5% in the kinetic energy (H k ) of each site [15]. Therefore, the increasing value per site of H k is obtained from the integer part of the 0.05H k . In this study, +1 and −1 values of spin variable S i are related with species B (Au), while species A (Cu) is represented with 0 value of S i .The computed values of the thermodynamic quantities are averages over the lattice and over the number of time steps (1.000.000) with discard of the first 100.000 time steps during which the cellular automaton develops.The ground state diagram of the fcc BEG model is illustrated in Fig where α indicate sublattices (α = a, b, c, d) (Fig. 2).According to the values of the sublattice order parameters, the model has the five different phases (P , F , A 3 B(a), AB 3 (f ), AB (type-1)) at absolute zero temperature and two different phases (A 3 B(f ) and AB (type-II)) above absolute zero temperature for −3 ≤ k < −1 [21, 24]:These phase definitions except AB ordering structure are compatible with the MFA and the CVM studies [21,24,25]. In this study ferrimagnetic AB ordering structure appears as AB (type-I) and AB (type-II) ordering structures while the MFA and the CVM studies do not exhibit this separation. In the interval −8 < d < 0 through the k = −3 line, the model has the paramagnetic A 3 B(P ) ground state ordering. In the A 3 B(P ) ordering structure, three of the sublattices are occupied by A (S i = 0) species ( (Fig. 3(a)). This result shows that the observing of the sublattices is necessary to decide the type of ordering and the phase transition. In the interval −7.3 < d < −7 for k = −3, the model exhibits the second order successive A 3 B(a) − F − P phase transition. As it is seen in Fig. 4 at the these successive phase transitions while the sublattice susceptibilities (χ ...