1965
DOI: 10.1080/00028896509342739
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Re-entrainment of Particles from a Plane Surface

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
39
0

Year Published

1979
1979
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
3

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 97 publications
(39 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
0
39
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The results of the latter demonstrate that very high velocities, unrealistic of what would be found in the indoor environment, are required to resuspend significant quantities of coarse particles. Corn and Stein (1965) did not observe resuspension for 10.6 μm glass particles at 30, 60, and 90 m/s, and it was not until a velocity of 117 m/s that resuspension was reported, and Jiang et al (2008) found that velocities greater than 50 m/s were necessary to resuspend 11 μm poly(methyl methacrylate) (PMMA) particles. Additionally, a recent wind tunnel investigation by Goldasteh et al (in press) observed minimal resuspension for 1-10 μm dust particles from linoleum flooring for velocities below 18 m/s (resuspension fraction remained below 0.10).…”
Section: Particle Size and Air Velocitymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…The results of the latter demonstrate that very high velocities, unrealistic of what would be found in the indoor environment, are required to resuspend significant quantities of coarse particles. Corn and Stein (1965) did not observe resuspension for 10.6 μm glass particles at 30, 60, and 90 m/s, and it was not until a velocity of 117 m/s that resuspension was reported, and Jiang et al (2008) found that velocities greater than 50 m/s were necessary to resuspend 11 μm poly(methyl methacrylate) (PMMA) particles. Additionally, a recent wind tunnel investigation by Goldasteh et al (in press) observed minimal resuspension for 1-10 μm dust particles from linoleum flooring for velocities below 18 m/s (resuspension fraction remained below 0.10).…”
Section: Particle Size and Air Velocitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Many monolayer studies have examined particles >10 μm in diameter, e.g., Braaten (1994) and Ibrahim et al (2003Ibrahim et al ( , 2004Ibrahim et al ( , 2008, which more easily resuspend compared to their smaller counterparts, and only a few studies, e.g., Corn and Stein (1965), Jiang et al (2008), and Goldasteh et al (in press), have examined particles near 10 μm in diameter. The results of the latter demonstrate that very high velocities, unrealistic of what would be found in the indoor environment, are required to resuspend significant quantities of coarse particles.…”
Section: Particle Size and Air Velocitymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations