2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.neucie.2021.04.002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Re-Do endoscopic third ventriculostomy. Retrospective analysis of 13 patients

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Thanks to the advent of neuroendoscopic techniques, instruments and devices, hydrocephalus may be solved in a relevant percentage of patients by performing an endoscopic third ventriculostomy (ETV), therefore avoiding the gaps in these LIC. Endoscopic techniques produce minimal lesion to the healthy cerebral tissue with less complications and provides excellent clinical results in terms of hydrocephalus resolution ( Jiménez et al., 2007 ; Shim et al., 2017 ; Lu et al., 2019 ; Jiang et al., 2018 ; Jimenez et al., 2017 ; Uche et al., 2018 ; Linares et al., 2021 ). However, the neuroendoscopy learning curve requires observing, as well as laboratory practice with neuroimage systems or even with virtual reality models before any attempt to perform an ETV ( Baby et al., 2020 ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thanks to the advent of neuroendoscopic techniques, instruments and devices, hydrocephalus may be solved in a relevant percentage of patients by performing an endoscopic third ventriculostomy (ETV), therefore avoiding the gaps in these LIC. Endoscopic techniques produce minimal lesion to the healthy cerebral tissue with less complications and provides excellent clinical results in terms of hydrocephalus resolution ( Jiménez et al., 2007 ; Shim et al., 2017 ; Lu et al., 2019 ; Jiang et al., 2018 ; Jimenez et al., 2017 ; Uche et al., 2018 ; Linares et al., 2021 ). However, the neuroendoscopy learning curve requires observing, as well as laboratory practice with neuroimage systems or even with virtual reality models before any attempt to perform an ETV ( Baby et al., 2020 ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The efficacy of primary ETV has been reported to range between 36.5% and 70.6%, and of secondary ETV between 74.1% and 76%, depending on the different centers, age groups, and etiologies [ 28 ]. Recent studies have reported varying outcomes of Re-ETV in cases of failure, but overall they tend to favor its performance [ 19 , 24 ]. Preferably, an endoscopic exploration that involves reopening the ventriculostomy orifice should be considered as a treatment option.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%