Re-directing Climate Change and Terrorism by Allying Classical with Quantum Neural Computing

2017

Self Cite

This article explores a psychological view of zero and complex numbers under the embrace of classical with quantum computing. At first, the author broaches classical computing, after-the-fact learning, and the perfect finiteness of the first attention spared in high-functioning autistics. Secondly, he deals with quantum computing, before-the-fact learning, and the less-than-perfect infinity of the second attention impaired in the autistic spectrum before the age of three years. The author emphasizes that quantum computing in the second step agrees with quantum coherence, the angle Greek Pi () in radians, Euler's Identity (e i + 1 = 0), and the exploration of schizophrenic interpretations with a probability of existence equivalent to algebraic zero. Thirdly, this article shows that the alliance of classical with quantum computing, or of the first with the second attention, allows the atoned self to reach transcendental zero, quantum decoherence, and a renovated home in the arms of the Third Attention. In turn, the renewal brought by the Third Attention can be linked to the angle twice Greek Pi (, or Tau), the "Tau" Identity (e i -1 = 0), the union of real with imaginary numbers in complex numbers, and the proposition by Pythagoras that "all is number."

Section: The Impact Of Global Warming At the Turn Of The 21st Centurymentioning

confidence: 82%

Section: The Uncertainty That Presses the Nature Of Zeromentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 2 more Smart Citations

A Psychological View of Complex Numbers through Classical and Quantum Computing

2017

Self Cite

“…In a June article on the International Journal of Social Science Studies (Cassella, 2017c), I elaborated on the hope of International Journal of Social Science Studies Vol. 5, No.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Freeing Leonardo da Vinci’s Fight for the Standard in the Hall of the Five Hundred at Florence’s Palazzo Vecchio

2017

Self Cite

Beyond previous hypotheses, the author envisions here that, after drilling a 1/2-inch hole at 0.915 meters from the floor, on the vertical line that leaves the virtual larynx of the screaming supine soldier in the Battle of Marciano, a laparoscope will point at the virtual larynx of the yelling prostrate soldier in the Fight for the Standard. Our wild assault against the wild and against humanistic intelligence is unsustainable. From a humanistic standpoint, the quantum-computing search to see again the classical-computing conflict attached to the Fight for the Standard will lead to a global Renaissance: The union of ancient knowledge about social values with modern scientific and technological skills will dispel global warming and fundamentalist-driven terrorism, while freeing our descendants to explore the cosmos in the next 7000 years.

A Cognitive View of the Cosmos and the Universal Grammar

2022

This article shows that nature’s nature,[1] the cosmos, and the universal grammar behind all languages agree with the ironic “semeiotic” of the American Charles Sanders Peirce (“/pɜːrs/” IPA[2]). He stressed (Peirce, 1868) the crossing of classical (“yes against no”) with quantum (“yes and no”) computing in two propositions: “There is no griffin” and “A griffin is a winged quadruped.” His logic, confused with American Pragmatism, lies unused. Yet global warming and the death of children without proper food and water can be eluded. Salvation relies on seizing now Peirce’s “science of irony,” two missing artworks by Leonardo da Vinci, autism, folly, and the circle of complex numbers (“z”) that enlightens two finite universes in which matter counters anti-matter. The cosmos, led by infinity in dark energy and zero in dark matter, echoes the union of enemies, shame after sinning, freedom after slavery, and forgiveness for justice.[1] The three attentions/intentions behind my hypothetical “Logos Heuristics” (or “L”) about nature’s nature use the following notation:Our underlined 1st attention (1) goes 99% with the recall (Zaitchik, 1990; Povinelli et al., 1996), finiteness, or classical computing (p = probability = 1) spared in autistics (about 1% of us)—who fancy the stable truths they see;the 2nd attention (2), the quantum computing (p = 1 and 0) hurt in autistics—or our going with hope in facing doubts, sins, plights, puns, metaphors, problems, infinity, nothingness, and paradoxes—goes in bold; andthe 3rd attention (3), or our ironic ability to solve a problem—wronged in schizophrenics (near 1% of us), who see the lies they fancy—combines underlining and bold or is stressed with an irregular Capital.[2] IPA is the International Phonetic Alphabet.