2007
DOI: 10.1038/447918a
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Re-crowning mammals

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2012
2012

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…2). According to this reconstruction, the presence of SCAND3 and KRBA2 in almost all eutherian genomes (including the basal mammalian subgroups, afrotherians and xenarthans) and the detection of SCAND3 in at least the wallaby, suggest that SCAN/KRAB C-INTs (or at least SCAND3) might have originated prior to the eutherian-metatherian split (145–65 million years ago 30 , 31 ). Thus, SCAND3 and KRBA2 are restricted to therian mammals (eutherians and metatherians) and their respective phylogenies follow that expected for single copy genes vertically inherited from a therian ancestor.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…2). According to this reconstruction, the presence of SCAND3 and KRBA2 in almost all eutherian genomes (including the basal mammalian subgroups, afrotherians and xenarthans) and the detection of SCAND3 in at least the wallaby, suggest that SCAN/KRAB C-INTs (or at least SCAND3) might have originated prior to the eutherian-metatherian split (145–65 million years ago 30 , 31 ). Thus, SCAND3 and KRBA2 are restricted to therian mammals (eutherians and metatherians) and their respective phylogenies follow that expected for single copy genes vertically inherited from a therian ancestor.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…Incumbency or priority effects, where one clade excludes or hinders another owing not to competitive superiority but to historical contingency (colonization or origination sequence) (e.g., Case 1991; Almany 2003; Fukami 2004; Irving et al 2007; Louette and De Meester 2007), are held to underlie many macroevolutionary lags (e.g., Valentine 1980; Van Valen 1985; Rosenzweig and McCord 1991; Alroy 1996; Jablonski and Sepkoski 1996; Eldredge 1997, 2002; Jablonski 2000, 2001; Seilacher et al 2007). As already noted, the most famous example is the Mesozoic lag and early Cenozoic diversification of the mammals (Alroy 1999 and references therein; Bininda‐Emonds et al [2007] were taken to negate an evolutionary effect of dinosaur extinction on mammals, but their molecular analysis overemphasized crown groups, see Cifelli and Gordon 2007; Wible et al 2007). Other examples of evolutionary incumbency and its release arguably include other diversifications following major extinction events (Miller and Sepkoski 1988; Patzkowsky 1995; Foote 1997; McKinney 1998; Sepkoski 1998; Erwin 2001; Jablonski 2001) (Fig.…”
Section: Apparent Contradictions Across Scalesmentioning
confidence: 99%