2000
DOI: 10.1348/000709900158182
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

(Re‐) Constructing pre‐linguistic interpersonal processes to promote language development in young children with deviant or delayed communication skills

Abstract: The results indicate that the development of language skills can be promoted more effectively through (re-) constructing the interpersonal framework of pre-linguistic communicative development than through conventional intervention focusing directly upon language per se.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0
1

Year Published

2004
2004
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
1
1

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
0
2
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The procedure is described in detail in Smith and Fluck (2000). In summary, the baseline phase involved the initial training of parents and education staff on the principals of the Intervention, and the assessment of each child in terms of cognitive stage of play with objects, stage of participation in social games and language levels.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The procedure is described in detail in Smith and Fluck (2000). In summary, the baseline phase involved the initial training of parents and education staff on the principals of the Intervention, and the assessment of each child in terms of cognitive stage of play with objects, stage of participation in social games and language levels.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Ignoring can be effective in some ways, and interestingly seems to work in methods for training wild or disobedient animals; in the case of intensely social animals such as horses, the ignoring seems to function to attract the animal to the 'ignorer' (whether human or senior horse), rather than to inhibit any particular behaviour directly (Roberts 1996). Some therapies for people with communication disorders explicitly reject behaviourist therapies -partly because they involve a necessary de-personalisation of the 'patient' , and partly because they portray the problem as one of 'behavior' ignoring motivations and anxieties and subjective orientation (Smith & Fluck 2000).…”
Section: Moving Others: Psychological Research Findingsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Δπίζεο θαηά ηε δηάξθεηα ηνπ παηρληδηνχ κε ηε κεηέξα επέδεημαλ πεξηζζφηεξν αιιειεπηδξαζηηθφ παηρλίδη, αιιά ιηγφηεξν ζπλεξγαηηθφ παηρλίδη, ζπγθξηλφκελα κε ηα ΣΑ παηδηά.Elsabbagh, Gliga, Pickles, θαη ζπλ., 2012. Smith andFluck, 2000) νη φπνηεο δηαθνξέο δελ βξέζεθαλ ζηαηηζηηθά ζεκαληηθέο. Σα απνηειέζκαηα ηεο έξεπλάο καο δηαθέξνπλ απφ ηελ έξεπλα ησλ Aarne θαη Tallberg (2010), νη νπνίνη ππνζηήξημαλ φηη ηα παηδηά κε ΔΓΓ παξνπζίαδαλ ηε ζπκπεξηθνξά ελαιιαγήο βιέκκαηνο ζηελ ίδηα ζπρλφηεηα κε ΣΑ παηδηά αληίζηνηρεο γισζζηθήο ειηθίαο, αιιά νινθιήξσλαλ ηνλ θχθιν ηεο ελαιιαγήο ζε κεγαιχηεξν ρξνληθφ δηάζηεκα.…”
unclassified