2008
DOI: 10.1007/s10943-008-9179-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Re-conceptualizing the Factor Structure of the Brief Multidimensional Measure of Religiousness/Spirituality

Abstract: The results suggest the BMMRS assesses distinct positive and negative aspects of religiousness and spirituality that may be best conceptualized in a psychoneuroimmunological context as measuring: (a) Spiritual Experiences (i.e., emotional experience of feeling connected with a higher power/the universe); (b) Religious Practices (i.e., prayer, rituals, service attendance); (c) Congregational Support; and (d) Forgiveness (i.e., a specific coping strategy that can be conceptualized as religious or non-religious i… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4

Citation Types

2
64
1
5

Year Published

2013
2013
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 94 publications
(72 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
2
64
1
5
Order By: Relevance
“…This self-report instrument, originally published by the Fetzer Institute & National Institute on Aging Working Group [13], assesses the following dimensions as defined by Johnstone et al [23]: (a) positive (15 items) and negative (two items) spiritual experiences (positive and negative emotional experiences of connectedness with a higher power/the universe/God); (b) forgiveness (five items; a specific coping strategy of forgiving others/oneself and being forgiven by a higher power/God); (c) cultural-religious practices (five items; prayers, rituals, and religious services); (d) positive (two items) and negative (two items) congregational support (support or rejection by the religious community). Each item is scored on a zero-to three-point Likert-type scale.…”
Section: Brief Multidimensional Measure Of Religiousness/spiritualitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This self-report instrument, originally published by the Fetzer Institute & National Institute on Aging Working Group [13], assesses the following dimensions as defined by Johnstone et al [23]: (a) positive (15 items) and negative (two items) spiritual experiences (positive and negative emotional experiences of connectedness with a higher power/the universe/God); (b) forgiveness (five items; a specific coping strategy of forgiving others/oneself and being forgiven by a higher power/God); (c) cultural-religious practices (five items; prayers, rituals, and religious services); (d) positive (two items) and negative (two items) congregational support (support or rejection by the religious community). Each item is scored on a zero-to three-point Likert-type scale.…”
Section: Brief Multidimensional Measure Of Religiousness/spiritualitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[17][18][19][20] In addition, some research also suggests that although related, spirituality can exist separately from religious beliefs and practices. 21 Spirituality can generally be conceptualised as the experience of a direct relationship with a higher power, and feelings of purpose based on the belief in this power that allows for self-exploration and discovery of a meaningful life.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The BMMRS is a 38-item, self-report measure designed to distinguish between the concepts of spirituality and religiosity while measuring their connection to health (Fetzer Institute & National Institute on Aging Working Group, 1999;Johnstone, McCormack, Yoon, & Smith, 2012;Johnstone, Yoon, Franklin, Schopp, & Hinkebein, 2009). The instrument was developed under the assumption that religiousness and spirituality are linked to health through behavioral, social, psychological, and physiological factors (Fetzer Institute & National Institute on Aging Working Group, 1999).…”
Section: The Brief Multidimensional Measure Of Religiousness/spirituamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The instrument was developed under the assumption that religiousness and spirituality are linked to health through behavioral, social, psychological, and physiological factors (Fetzer Institute & National Institute on Aging Working Group, 1999). The instrument includes 12 domains each selected by developers based upon their theoretical or practical influence on health outcomes (Fetzer Institute & National Institute on Aging Working Group, 1999;Johnstone et al, 2009;J. Williams et al, 2012).…”
Section: The Brief Multidimensional Measure Of Religiousness/spirituamentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation