2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.cmi.2018.01.012
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Re: “Comparison of antipseudomonal betalactams for febrile neutropenia empiric therapy: systematic review and network metaanalysis” by Horita et al.

Abstract: Letter to the Editor Re: "Comparison of antipseudomonal betalactams for febrile neutropenia empiric therapy: systematic review and network metaanalysis" by Horita et al. Dear Sir,We read with interest the recent network meta-analysis published by Horita et al. comparing different b-lactams in the empirical treatment of febrile neutropenia (FN) [1]. We consider that the authors draw debatable conclusions that could encourage unjustifiably wide use of imipenem/cilastatin in individuals with FN. Another meta-anal… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Although there are data to support DE in patients who are afebrile for at least 48 hours, the team felt more comfortable using a 72 hour timeframe to distinguish any new fevers arising from new infections being related to DE. 5 The primary endpoint was the difference in number of antibiotic therapy days between the pre and post DE group. 'Antibiotic therapy days' was defined as the total number of days that empiric broad spectrum antipseudomonal antibiotics were administered upon presentation of initial fever, excluding any prophylactic antimicrobials.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Although there are data to support DE in patients who are afebrile for at least 48 hours, the team felt more comfortable using a 72 hour timeframe to distinguish any new fevers arising from new infections being related to DE. 5 The primary endpoint was the difference in number of antibiotic therapy days between the pre and post DE group. 'Antibiotic therapy days' was defined as the total number of days that empiric broad spectrum antipseudomonal antibiotics were administered upon presentation of initial fever, excluding any prophylactic antimicrobials.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…4 Early antibiotic DE is endorsed by the European Conference on Infections in Leukemia guidelines, which recommend discontinuing antibiotics after 72 hours if a neutropenic patient has been stable since presentation and has been afebrile for at least 48 hours. 5 While there is emerging guidance to support antibiotic DE before neutropenic recovery, there is no universal consensus to implement this practice, and the supporting evidence is based on limited data, especially in a highly immunocompromised HCT and chimeric antigen (CAR) Tcell therapy patient population.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Measures for managing febrile neutropenia were based on the guidelines of the Infectious Diseases Society of America and the European Conference on Infections in Leukemia. 26,27 Treatment-related toxicity and other adverse events were evaluated after each treatment course and were graded using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) version 5.0.…”
Section: Genomic Analysis and Clearance Of Clonal Mutated Variantsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It seems that Dr. Averbuch considered that our systematic review recommends only imipenem/cilastatin in FN patients because imipenem/cilastatin was related to the highest treatment success rate and the lowest all-cause death rates [1]. However, we do not recommend imipenem/cilastatin solely: in the article, we clearly stated that imipenem/cilastatin, piperacillin/tazobactam, and meropenem may be reasonable first-choice medications for febrile neutropenia empiric therapy [2].…”
mentioning
confidence: 90%