2005
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijms.2005.07.008
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Re-certification of a series of uranium isotope reference materials: IRMM-183, IRMM-184, IRMM-185, IRMM-186 and IRMM-187

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
15
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 35 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
1
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For isotope ratio measurements, systematic biases due to matrix effects are well documented in literature [2]. TIMS measurements are less susceptible to such biases and therefore have been more widely applied to certification measurements of isotopic CRMs [3][4][5][6][7][8]. Most commonly used TIMS analytical methods are total evaporation (TE), modified total evaporation (MTE), and conventional analyses.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For isotope ratio measurements, systematic biases due to matrix effects are well documented in literature [2]. TIMS measurements are less susceptible to such biases and therefore have been more widely applied to certification measurements of isotopic CRMs [3][4][5][6][7][8]. Most commonly used TIMS analytical methods are total evaporation (TE), modified total evaporation (MTE), and conventional analyses.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Typically, the 236 U-240 Pu system is the least likely to be affected by postproduction disturbance or contamination. This is because 240 Pu has a relatively short half-life (6,563 years), and the 236 U/ 240 Pu ratio therefore changes relatively quickly, but also because 236 U is either absent or present in very low abundance in natural and low-enriched uranium (LEU) (Richter et al 2005. As a result, contamination of bulk plutonium with natural uranium or LEU will only minimally affect this ratio (Sturm et al 2014).…”
Section: Figurementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The instrument was tuned using the NBS-960 standard to achieve flat peak tops and stable signal intensity. Mass fractionation was corrected by bracketing samples with standard NBS U010 using the 238 U/ 234 U ratio of 18,354 (Richter et al, 2005). The more abundant isotopes 238 U and 235 U were measured statically in Faraday cups while the minor U isotope 234 U was measured using the central discrete-dynode secondary electron multiplier (SEM).…”
Section: ( 234 U/ 238 U) Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%