Re-Building Coal Country: A Church/University Partnership

Abstract

This paper describes a developing partnership between a church-based service learning center and a university initiative to build a field station in a low-income community in the anthracite coal region of Pennsylvania. It is a case study of how secular and religious institutions have been collaborating to achieve the shared goal of improving social conditions in specific communities. The theoretical focus of the paper is on how a change from a "glass is half empty" to a "glass is half full" perception of the community opens new possibilities for change. This paper concentrates on the story of one partnership as a case study demonstrating current trends in service learning both within universities and within the Catholic Church in America. Analysis centers on the basic question of why the project had symbolic power for both partners and on the institutional processes within both organizations that helped the partnership grow. We use the framework of Assets-Based Community Development (ABCD), also known as the "strengths perspective", to conceptualize the contrast.

Can community-based organisations be ‘managed’? An exploration

“…CBOs may dissolve into community life and then reappear when a critical issue arises. They may exist as action nodes in communities where they stimulate specific projects that are operated by other, more formal organizations but where those projects would not happen if the CBO did not stimulate action (Milofsky and Green, 2016). And CBOs may exist primarily as an experiential phenomenon that is important for participants but where it is hard to mobilize resources or manage them in an accountable way (Chen 2009).…”

Connecting with Community and Facilitating Learning through the Little Rock Congregations Study

“…Whereas universities might be seen as ivory towers, places of worship are typically with the people of the community in a critical and personal way, thus providing an access point for broader collaboration to address local social problems. Indeed, partnerships between places of worship and universities illustrate how trust can be built between these institutions (Cantor et al, 2013) and utilized to leverage community assets (Milofsky & Green, 2016) that can build bridges between the institutions and the community they serve.…”