2017
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-69548-8_16
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

RDF Updates with Constraints

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
2
2

Relationship

3
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In this context, two aspects of our work can be considered as particularly original: (i) the use of graph rewriting techniques and (ii) the adoption of CWA with RDF data. Concerning the first aspect, to generalize and abstract consistent updating methods, different works have used formalisms such as tree automata or grammars for XML ( [28,37] as surveys) or first order logic for relational (such as [38]) and, currently, graph databases (e.g., [7,9,15]).…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…In this context, two aspects of our work can be considered as particularly original: (i) the use of graph rewriting techniques and (ii) the adoption of CWA with RDF data. Concerning the first aspect, to generalize and abstract consistent updating methods, different works have used formalisms such as tree automata or grammars for XML ( [28,37] as surveys) or first order logic for relational (such as [38]) and, currently, graph databases (e.g., [7,9,15]).…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These differences are the consequence of different views of the problem and influence the semantic of changes of each particular proposal. As in [7,15], we consider updates as changes in the world rather than as a revision in our knowledge of the world ( [17,18]). In such update context, the chase procedure is usually associated to the generation of side-effects imposing extra insertions or deletions (w.r.t.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Deleting the fact servedByStation(Louvre, P alaisRoyal) may just correspond to the insertion of servedByStation(Louvre, N2) avoiding all the backward chaining of constraint rules. Our proposal in [36] deals with this aspect.…”
Section: Constraints and Updatesmentioning
confidence: 99%