2002
DOI: 10.1016/s1359-4311(01)00100-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

RDF production plants: I Design and costs

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
55
0
2

Year Published

2012
2012
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
4
4
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 107 publications
(57 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
0
55
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…It is also seen as the most natural way of recycling through biological reactions to achieve environmental self-cleaning among the various disposal options [41,42]. However, the cost of organic fertilizer composted from food waste still lacks competitiveness with respect to chemical fertilizers.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is also seen as the most natural way of recycling through biological reactions to achieve environmental self-cleaning among the various disposal options [41,42]. However, the cost of organic fertilizer composted from food waste still lacks competitiveness with respect to chemical fertilizers.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is a similar CAPEX to the 4 MWe turnkey RDF solution from Chamco [43], which presents a cost of 3977 €/kWe (less 6.6% than the 4 MWe cost model used). In addition, the RDF selection and treatment (eventual pelletizing) represents a cost for the power plant (10-21 €/ton of RDF [44]), depending on the process configuration and MSW composition. Annual O&M costs differ significantly from different references: for similar Termiska Processer power plant technology applied to the Chianti power plant but with larger power (75 MWe) O&M are 21% of the CAPEX, with waste disposal cost included in the O&M cost [42]; for the Chamco solution the O&M are estimated slightly above 13% of CAPEX per year [43]; a different study from Klein [45] pre sents an annual O&M cost for RDF gasification power plants from 9 to 20 % of CAPEX, including a 38 €/ton ash disposal cost.…”
Section: Hybrid Solutionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Hammermills and shredders are discussed briefly below. The typical power requirement and capital and operational cost of these technologies are presented in Table 13 based on a study in Italy (Caputo and Pelagagge 2002).…”
Section: Waste Size Reductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(EIPPCB 2006). Table 13 shows the typical power requirements and capital and operational costs of thermal drying and densification of MSW based on a study done in Italy (it is not clear what type of dryer was used in that study) (Caputo and Pelagagge 2002).…”
Section: Drying and Densificationmentioning
confidence: 99%