2018
DOI: 10.4018/jdm.2018100101
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

RDF Keyword Search by Query Computation

Abstract: Keyword searches based on the keywords-to-SPARQL translation is attracting more attention because of a growing number of excellent SPARQL search engines. Current approaches for keyword search based on the keywords-to-SPARQL translation suffer from returning incomplete answers or wrong answers due to a lack of underlying schema information. To overcome these difficulties, in this article, we propose a new keyword search paradigm by translating keyword queries into SPARQL queries for exploring RDF data. An inter… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
1
1

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
(3 reference statements)
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…With the rapid increase in the number of RDF(S) on the Web, it has become increasingly important to efficiently store massive amounts of RDF(S). The storage of RDF(S) (Ma, Capretz and Yan, 2016) often supports efficient queries of RDF data, mainly because the storage structure of RDF(S) not only directly determines the integrity of storage semantics, but also greatly affects its query efficiency Ma, et al, 2018). At present, there have been many studies on RDF(S) storage methods, which can be roughly divided into the following three categories: 1) Memory-based storage (e.g., Sesame (Broekstra, et al, 2002) and BitMat (Atre, et al, 2008)).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…With the rapid increase in the number of RDF(S) on the Web, it has become increasingly important to efficiently store massive amounts of RDF(S). The storage of RDF(S) (Ma, Capretz and Yan, 2016) often supports efficient queries of RDF data, mainly because the storage structure of RDF(S) not only directly determines the integrity of storage semantics, but also greatly affects its query efficiency Ma, et al, 2018). At present, there have been many studies on RDF(S) storage methods, which can be roughly divided into the following three categories: 1) Memory-based storage (e.g., Sesame (Broekstra, et al, 2002) and BitMat (Atre, et al, 2008)).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…al. [39] described a keywords-to-SPARQL translation process that circumvents the lack of underlying schema information. They compute, from the RDF data graph, an inter-entity relationship summary with complete schema information, and adopt a search prioritization scheme that combines the degree of a vertex with the distance from the original keyword element.…”
Section: Abstractearch Systemsmentioning
confidence: 99%