2011
DOI: 10.1080/0361526x.2011.617297
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

RDA: End of the World Postponed?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Thus, a unique opportunity presented itself to observe discourse around the current process of further refinement, illuminating cataloguers’ experiences with cataloguing in RDA. Previous publications have considered the suitability and usability of both AACR2 and RDA, sometimes in very specific areas (McGarry and Yee, 1990; Sheridan 1979; Tosaka and Park, 2013), and while opinion pieces on both from the cataloguing community have been plentiful (Martell, 1981; Randall, 2011; Sanchez, 2011), it has not been possible previously to witness in ‘real time’ the engagement of the community in the ongoing development of a code. AACR was presented, in all its editions and revisions, as a ‘fait accompli’.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, a unique opportunity presented itself to observe discourse around the current process of further refinement, illuminating cataloguers’ experiences with cataloguing in RDA. Previous publications have considered the suitability and usability of both AACR2 and RDA, sometimes in very specific areas (McGarry and Yee, 1990; Sheridan 1979; Tosaka and Park, 2013), and while opinion pieces on both from the cataloguing community have been plentiful (Martell, 1981; Randall, 2011; Sanchez, 2011), it has not been possible previously to witness in ‘real time’ the engagement of the community in the ongoing development of a code. AACR was presented, in all its editions and revisions, as a ‘fait accompli’.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…When AACR2 was published, controversies in the library community surrounding the new cataloging code were once described as the "war of AACR 2" (Martell, 1981, p. 4). Apparently, the reception of RDA has not reached the same level of criticism and acrimony that characterized the previous cataloging code revision (Randall, 2011). Compared with end-user research, however, a larger (if still relatively small) number of studies have been conducted on practitioners' views on the new cataloging code-if only to gather information about the technical, operational, and financial implications of RDA implementation.…”
Section: Practitioners' Views On Rdamentioning
confidence: 99%