2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.rasd.2015.06.002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

RCT examining the effect of treatment intensity for a psychosocial treatment for high-functioning children with ASD

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These studies utilized a variety of intervention approaches, including a comprehensive school-based intervention (Lopata et al, 2012, 2013), a comprehensive psychosocial treatment (Lopata, Thomeer, et al, 2015), a modified computerized dynamic facial emotion training tool, the MiX (Russo-Ponsaran et al, 2016), a social adjustment enhancement intervention (Solomon et al, 2004), and a group-based Social Competence Intervention (Schmidt et al, 2011; Stichter et al, 2010). Of the seven studies, three utilized a control group design (Lopata, Thomeer, et al, 2015; Russo-Ponsaran et al, 2016; Solomon et al, 2004). In addition to these studies that reported statistically significant changes, Baghdadli and colleagues (2013) found that children exhibited fewer errors for recognition of anger (Adult Faces only) following treatment.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These studies utilized a variety of intervention approaches, including a comprehensive school-based intervention (Lopata et al, 2012, 2013), a comprehensive psychosocial treatment (Lopata, Thomeer, et al, 2015), a modified computerized dynamic facial emotion training tool, the MiX (Russo-Ponsaran et al, 2016), a social adjustment enhancement intervention (Solomon et al, 2004), and a group-based Social Competence Intervention (Schmidt et al, 2011; Stichter et al, 2010). Of the seven studies, three utilized a control group design (Lopata, Thomeer, et al, 2015; Russo-Ponsaran et al, 2016; Solomon et al, 2004). In addition to these studies that reported statistically significant changes, Baghdadli and colleagues (2013) found that children exhibited fewer errors for recognition of anger (Adult Faces only) following treatment.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This study used a different measure for facial emotion recognition testing (CAM-C) and it demonstrated treatment sensitivity. This is a promising development as questions have been raised about the ability of emotion recognition tests to detect treatment gains associated with psychosocial treatments (Lopata et al, 2015). Although the facial emotion recognition results were promising and reflected significant improvement in the children’s skills, they were based on an average gain of approximately two points.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%