2020
DOI: 10.1007/s11468-020-01118-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

RCS Reduction from Conformal Surfaces Using Plasma-Based AMC Arrays

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For comparison, Figure 7 also shows the full-wave simulated results obtained thru CST [11]. Simulations are performed based on the Drude model in Equation ( 3), which is a popular model that describes its interaction between plasma and electromagnetic waves [8,9,12,15,16]. For comparison, Figure 7 also shows the full-wave simulated results obtained thru CST [11].…”
Section: Experimental Results and Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For comparison, Figure 7 also shows the full-wave simulated results obtained thru CST [11]. Simulations are performed based on the Drude model in Equation ( 3), which is a popular model that describes its interaction between plasma and electromagnetic waves [8,9,12,15,16]. For comparison, Figure 7 also shows the full-wave simulated results obtained thru CST [11].…”
Section: Experimental Results and Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Among the various types of metasurfaces, the metasurface absorber, the coding metasurface, and the checkerboard surfaces all have outstanding performance in realizing radar cross-section (RCS) reduction and improving electromagnetic stealth performance. [21][22][23][24][25] Nowadays, the majority of devices are required to achieve electromagnetic stealth in the X-band to Ka-band to ensure radar detection and wireless communication. However, there are several drawbacks existing in absorber metamaterials, like, ferromagnets and carbonyl iron nanocrystalline flakes, such as large thickness, high density, and processing challenge.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Among the various types of metasurfaces, the metasurface absorber, the coding metasurface, and the checkerboard surfaces all have outstanding performance in realizing radar cross‐section (RCS) reduction and improving electromagnetic stealth performance 21–25 . Nowadays, the majority of devices are required to achieve electromagnetic stealth in the X‐band to Ka‐band to ensure radar detection and wireless communication.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, it is essential to achieve the RCS reduction of the curved surface structure in order to considerably reduce the aircraft's backward electromagnetic scattering and improve the target's combat survivability. The majority of the studies on RCS reduction of curved structures [4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18] that are currently available focus on convex structures [4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15], while concave structures [16][17][18] have received limited attention in previous studies. Ishii et al using a concave metasurface absorber, achieved a −10 dB RCS reduction at 9.88 GHz under normal incident [16].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%