RCHOP-14 therapy versus RCHOP-21 therapy for people with aggressive or advanced-stage indolent B-cell non-Hodgkins lymphoma: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Abstract

Background: With the advent of rituximab combined with cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, and prednisolone (RCHOP) treatment has become considered the appropriate chemotherapy treatment for aggressive or advanced-stage indolent B-cell non-Hodgkins lymphoma (NHL). In recent years, RCHOP-14 seems to have achieved better outcomes in patients with aggressive or advanced-stage indolent B-cell NHL than RCHOP-21.Methods: To verify the befitting chemotherapy regimens for patients with B-cell NHL, we searched the electronic databases for relevant English-language literature published in January 2020. The primary outcomes were complete response (CR), progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), and adverse events (AEs). Six eligible Phase II and III randomized controlled clinical trials (RCTs) and two high-quality observational comparative studies (OCSs) were extracted, with 5,565 patients with B-cell NHL involved in the evaluation. Results:The analysis demonstrated no significant difference in RCHOP-14 and RCHOP-21 CR rates [odds ratio (OR) =0.98, 95% CI: 0.77-1.24, P=0.85]. Compared with RCHOP-21, the merged hazard ratio (HR) after treatment with RCHOP-14 for PFS and OS was 0.94 (95% CI: 0.84-1.06, P=0.32) and 0.91 (95% CI: 0.83-1.01, P=0.08), respectively. A subgroup analysis based on the international prognostic index (IPI) score showed that both chemotherapy regimens were applicable in B-cell NHL patients with different prognoses.The frequency of toxic side-effects was similar between schemes. Conclusions:The data presented suggest that the efficacy and safety of both regimens are comparable and that RCHOP-14 remains a viable plan in patients with B-cell NHL who prefer a shorter therapy course.