1981
DOI: 10.1130/0016-7606(1981)92<323:raugad>2.0.co;2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Rb-Sr and U-Pb geochronology and distribution of rock types in the Precambrian basement of Missouri and Kansas

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

0
20
0

Year Published

1994
1994
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 70 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
20
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The magnetic anomaly outlines the southeast Kansas igneous intrusive complex. A granite penetrated in the eastern well has been dated at 1348 Ma (U-Pb) (Bickford et al 1981) indicating that this body is part of the WGRP.…”
Section: The Midcontinent Rift In Kansas Nebraska and Oklahomamentioning
confidence: 98%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The magnetic anomaly outlines the southeast Kansas igneous intrusive complex. A granite penetrated in the eastern well has been dated at 1348 Ma (U-Pb) (Bickford et al 1981) indicating that this body is part of the WGRP.…”
Section: The Midcontinent Rift In Kansas Nebraska and Oklahomamentioning
confidence: 98%
“…3 and 4). Felsic rocks in this area have been dated at 1748 -1409 Ma (U -Pb) (Bickford et al 1981). This body could be associated with the Midcontinent Rift or the Central Plains orogeny .…”
Section: The Midcontinent Rift In Kansas Nebraska and Oklahomamentioning
confidence: 98%
“…These provinces are the Eastern Granite-Rhyolite (EGR) province and the Southern Granite-Rhyolite (SGR) province, with crystallization ages of~1,470 and 1,370 Ma, respectively (Bickford and Lewis 1979;Bickford et al 1981; Thomas et al 1984;Bickford and Van Schmus 1985;Van Schmus et al 1987;Van Schmus et al 1993a). These provinces along with other major crustal features of the mid-continent region are shown in Fig.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…A general summary of U-Pb and Sm-Nd results for the region is in Table 1. This includes U-Pb ages of zircons that have been sep arated from drill core or drill cuttings (Bickford et al, 1981a;Steeples and Bickford, 1981;Van Schmus and Bickford, 1981;Thomas et al, 1984;Van Schmus et al, 1987; this volume), as well as U-Pb ages of zircons from outcrop samples (Bickford and Mose, 1975;Bickford and Lewis, 1979;this volume). Sm-Nd Bickford and Lewis, 1979;2 = Bickford and Mose, 1975 (recalculated); 3 = Bickford et al, 1981a;4 = Hoppe et al, 1983;5 = Nelson and DePaolo, 1985;6 = Steeples and Bickford, 1981;7 = Thomas et al, 1984;8 = Van Schmus et al, 1987;9 =Turekand Robinson, 1982. § §Analyses from different portions of the drill core; differences mainly due to variations in mineral abundances.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%