2013
DOI: 10.1063/1.4829450
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Rayleigh-Bénard convection at high Rayleigh number and infinite Prandtl number: Asymptotics and numerics

Abstract: The problem of fast viscous steady Rayleigh-Bénard convection in a rectangular enclosure is revisited using asymptotic and numerical methods. There are two generic cases: in the first, there is zero shear stress at all boundaries; in the second, there is zero shear stress at the vertical boundaries, but no slip at the horizontal ones. For the first case, we reconcile our new numerical solutions to the full equations with earlier asymptotic results for large Rayleigh number and effectively infinite Prandtl numb… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
6
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
1
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Here we consider only the former case, following JZ87 with some changes of notation. More recent asymptotic analyses of high Rayleighnumber RBC with both free-slip and no-slip horizontal boundaries (Fowler, 2011;Vynnycky and Masuda, 2013) find excellent agreement with JZ87's results for the free-slip case.…”
Section: Flow In the Isothermal Coresupporting
confidence: 63%
“…Here we consider only the former case, following JZ87 with some changes of notation. More recent asymptotic analyses of high Rayleighnumber RBC with both free-slip and no-slip horizontal boundaries (Fowler, 2011;Vynnycky and Masuda, 2013) find excellent agreement with JZ87's results for the free-slip case.…”
Section: Flow In the Isothermal Coresupporting
confidence: 63%
“…The more accurate approach for a boundary layer flow solution by Vynnycky and Masuda (2013) might produce better quantitative agreement with the numerical results, but it requires more computation and was not followed. Although the present boundary layer solution does not give close quantitative comparison with numerical results, it has a simplicity that allows it to be used for teaching and communicating the dynamics to those in other disciplines .…”
Section: Summary and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This laminar regime should not be mistaken for that of viscous convection of an infinite-Prandtl or Schmidt fluid in the limit of large Rayleigh numbers. For such a case, the scaling Sh w ∼ Ra 1/5 w is expected between (no-slip) solid surfaces [51,52] (cf. regime I > ∞ of the Grossmann-Lohse theory [53]) and Sh w ∼ Ra 1/3 w between (zero shear stress) free surfaces [51,52,54].…”
Section: A Effect Of Convective Dissolutionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…For such a case, the scaling Sh w ∼ Ra 1/5 w is expected between (no-slip) solid surfaces [51,52] (cf. regime I > ∞ of the Grossmann-Lohse theory [53]) and Sh w ∼ Ra 1/3 w between (zero shear stress) free surfaces [51,52,54]. However, the robustness of the 1/4 exponent present in all the aforementioned cases of laminar convection hints that neither the no-shear boundary condition nor the cell geometry impact the scaling significantly.…”
Section: A Effect Of Convective Dissolutionmentioning
confidence: 98%