Raven’s matrices performance in Down syndrome: Evidence of unusual errors

Gunn, Deborah; Jarrold, Christopher

doi:10.1016/j.ridd.2003.07.004

Cited by 27 publications

(17 citation statements)

References 19 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…The relative stability of the Series B scores can probably be attributed to the fact that all the age groups, including the youngest ones, scored poorly on these items, because of the complex processes they elicited (analogical modifications in spatially and logically organized drawings). Facon and Nuchadee (2010) found that a similar pattern of performance on the 36 items (Series A, Ab, and B) of the CPM was displayed by three different groups (DS, intellectual disability, unselected), although other studies have identified distinctive patterns of errors made by people with DS (Gunn & Jarrold, 2004;Vakil & Lifshitz-Zehavi, 2012). Results also showed that the decline observed in fluid intelligence, as measured by the CPM, is far from linear between 20 and 69 years.…”

Section: Age and Dimensionmentioning

confidence: 85%

Variability of the Aging Process in Dementia-Free Adults With Down Syndrome

Tsao¹,

Kindelberger²,

Fréminville³

et al. 2015

American Journal on Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The aim of this cross-sectional study was to analyze the typical aging process in adults with Down syndrome, focusing on its variability. The sample comprised 120 adults with Down syndrome who were free of dementia. Ages ranged from 20 to 69 years. Each participant was assessed on cognitive functioning and social adaptation, and was checked for the presence of psychopathological disorders. Results revealed an age-related deterioration in both cognitive and social adaptation skills, the extent of this decline depending on the dimension under scrutiny, and interindividual variability in aging profiles.

show abstract

Section: Age and Dimensionmentioning

confidence: 85%

Variability of the Aging Process in Dementia-Free Adults With Down Syndrome

Tsao¹,

Kindelberger²,

Fréminville³

et al. 2015

American Journal on Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Babcock, 2002) or developmental conditions (e.g. Gunn & Jarrold, 2004), among other findings. These analyses suggest that different groups of individuals may rely on different cognitive strategies to solve RPM items.…”

Section: Purpose and Motivation Of Our Studymentioning

confidence: 89%

“…Looking at differences in RPM errors patterns between different diagnostic groups has been done previously for individuals with Down's syndrome (Gunn & Jarrold, 2004) and also for individuals with Williams syndrome (Van Herwegen et al, 2011), but not for individuals with ASD. We present the following analysis as an initial step into this important area of scientific investigation.…”

Section: Analysis Of Errors Made By Children and Adults Across Develomentioning

confidence: 99%

Error patterns on the Raven's Standard Progressive Matrices Test

et al. 2016

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Although many psychometric tests, like the Raven's Progressive Matrices test, are commonly evaluated according to total score, additional variables can lend insight into the underlying cognitive processes of the test takers. We examine conceptual errors on the Raven's Standard Progressive Matrices (SPM) test. We present a new, complete classification of error types on the SPM using a two-kind coding scheme. We also present a new method for analyzing group errors patterns on these kinds of tests. We present two examples of this analysis using our SPM error classification. The first looks at the errors made by an artificial intelligence model of Raven's problem solving. The second example looks at the errors made by children and adults who are typically developing or have been diagnosed with autism. We close by discussing implications of this error classification and analysis method for the interpretation of SPM scores, towards a better understanding of the diversity of cognitive processes involved in Raven's problem solving.

show abstract

“…Ce type d'analyse permet de démontrer que les enfants au développement typique font majoritairement des erreurs de type « Répétitions de figures » (proportions d'environ 60 % des erreurs totales) et font relativement peu d'erreurs de type « Différence » (moins de 10 % des erreurs totales). Les autres types d'erreurs sont commis dans des proportions proches de 20 % environ (Gunn & Jarrold, 2004;van Herwegen, Farran & Annaz, 2011). Chez les personnes présentant une déficience intellectuelle, les patterns des types d'erreurs sont différents selon l'origine biologique de la déficience intellectuelle.…”

Section: Introductionunclassified

Analyse qualitative des performances d’enfants présentant une déficience intellectuelle aux Matrices Progressives Couleur de Raven

Bussy

Ducrocq

Fréminville

et al. 2016

rfdi

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Le test Matrices Progressives de Raven Couleur mesure les capacités de raisonnement analogique des personnes présentant une déficience intellectuelle. Quelques études ont montré la validité de cet outil psychométrique auprès de populations présentant une déficience en comparant les types d’erreurs commises. Nous proposons une analyse complémentaire au travers des types de problèmes résolus. Pour cela, nous avons comparé les types d’erreurs et les types de problèmes d’un groupe d’enfants présentant une déficience intellectuelle (N=22) et ceux d’un groupe d’enfants n’en présentant pas (N=22) appariés sur le score global. Les résultats montrent des patterns similaires tant au niveau des types d’erreurs commises que des types de problèmes résolus. Ces résultats confirment l’intérêt d’une analyse qualitative des performances à un test de raisonnement analogique.Raven’s Coloured Progressive Matrices is usually used to estimated analogical reasoning in intellectual deficiency and normal development. Many studies have demonstrated the validity of this test in adults with intellectual disability by error analysis. The current study aims to assess the types of errors and types of problems resolved by individuals with intellectual disability (N=22) and mental age matched control children (N = 22), in order to demonstrated validity of RCPM. Results show similar pattern of errors and problems resolved in both groups. These results are discussed in regard of previously studies and confirm the interest in a qualitative analysis of analogical reasoning test

show abstract

Raven’s matrices performance in Down syndrome: Evidence of unusual errors

Cited by 27 publications

References 19 publications

Variability of the Aging Process in Dementia-Free Adults With Down Syndrome

Variability of the Aging Process in Dementia-Free Adults With Down Syndrome

Error patterns on the Raven's Standard Progressive Matrices Test

Analyse qualitative des performances d’enfants présentant une déficience intellectuelle aux Matrices Progressives Couleur de Raven

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About