Räumliche Mobilität als Prozess Kurz-und langfristigen Handelns: Zusammenhänge zwischen Wohn-und Alltagsmobilität

Kasper, Birgit; Scheiner, Joachim

doi:10.1007/978-3-531-90132-9_7

Cited by 6 publications

(3 citation statements)

References 0 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…This is equally true for job, leisure and shopping trips. These results are confirmed by a study of Scheiner (2005b) in the region of Cologne. As a consequence for planning, the concept of decentralised concentration seems to save traffic if we regard the total population.…”

Section: Consequences For Researchsupporting

confidence: 76%

“…Beyond doubt, the process of unifying Berlin is a very specific example for travel behaviour that can hardly be generalised. However, some more recent studies conducted in various spatial contexts and with various population groups also provide evidence for the relevance of long-term bonds with former places of residence and places of work (Geier et al, 2001;Simonsohn, 2003;Scheiner, 2004Scheiner, , 2005aScheiner, , 2005b. There are consequences for research on a number of different levels.…”

Section: What Is Left To Do? -Consequences For Researchmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Daily Mobility in Berlin

Scheiner

2020

European Journal of Transport and Infrastructure Research

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The article deals with the process of integration of East and West Berlin by means of the population's everyday mobility. Analysing activity spaces in four small-scale study areas on both sides of the former Berlin wall, there is evidence for significant differences between adjacent areas on both sides of the former wall as well as between different groups within an area. The interviewees' place of origin plays an important role. The question is, how – on the one hand – groups of persons might be characterised who tend to integrate the respective other half of the city more strongly into their everyday life ('border crossers') or – on the other hand – people still tend to concentrate on their respective half of the city a decade after the fall of the wall ('half-urbanites'). On the basis of spatial behaviour and the attitude towards the city's other half, four groups are differentiated. They are examined by a discriminant analysis as well as on the basis of semi-structured interviews with regard to dominating patterns of interpreting the German unification and their own personal identity. These patterns provide a considerable contribution for a better understanding of group-specific differences in the choice of mobility behaviour. From these results, consequences are drawn for the explanation of travel behaviour and for the theory and methodology of travel behaviour research. The hypothesis is developed that spatial action may not fully be explained by restrictive factors (infrastructure, distribution of opportunities, socio-demographic factors etc.). Additional factors which are empirically much more difficult to handle, such as attitudes, lifestyles, biographical experiences and long-term spatial orientations, are playing a role. The modelling of travel behaviour is theoretically incomplete by neglecting individual reasons of action. Any prediction of the future transport development might at least partly suffer from this weakness.

show abstract

Section: Consequences For Researchsupporting

confidence: 76%

Section: What Is Left To Do? -Consequences For Researchmentioning

confidence: 99%

Daily Mobility in Berlin

Scheiner

2020

European Journal of Transport and Infrastructure Research

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Besonders prägend ist natürlich die persönliche Situation am Arbeitsmarkt, wobei prekäre Beschäftigungsverhältnisse 73 und Arbeitslosigkeit(-serfahrung) hemmend auf die Eigentumsbildung wirken. Die immer stärker werdenden Erfordernisse nach beruflicher und damit häufig einhergehender örtlicher Mobilität sollten sich insbesondere in Deutschland, wo Wohneigentum in vielen Fällen als lebenslange Anschaffung verstanden wird und der Verkauf mit hohen Kosten und hohen bürokratischen Regularien verbunden ist, vermindernd auf die Wohneigentümerquote wirken(Kasper und Scheiner 2006;Nguyen und Shlomo 2009;Voigtländer 2006). Der Anstieg beruflicher Mobilität lässt sesshaftes Verhalten durch Wohneigentum unattraktiv oder zumindest nur schwer realisierbar erscheinen.…”

unclassified

Soziale Ungleichheiten beim Vermögen und Immobilienbesitz : eine Analyse von Vermögens- und Wohneigentumsungleichheiten im internationalen, innerdeutschen sowie historischen Vergleich

Kolb

2013

Schriften Aus Der Fakultät Sozial- Und Wirtschaftswissenschaften Der Otto-Friedrich-Universität Bamberg

Räumliche Mobilität als Prozess Kurz-und langfristigen Handelns: Zusammenhänge zwischen Wohn-und Alltagsmobilität

Cited by 6 publications

References 0 publications

Daily Mobility in Berlin

Daily Mobility in Berlin

Soziale Ungleichheiten beim Vermögen und Immobilienbesitz : eine Analyse von Vermögens- und Wohneigentumsungleichheiten im internationalen, innerdeutschen sowie historischen Vergleich

Verkehrsgeneseforschung

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About