2008
DOI: 10.1037/a0013712
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Rats and humans paying attention: Cross-species task development for translational research.

Abstract: Substantial gains have been made on the neurobiology of attention from systems neuroscience work in animal models and human cognitive neuroscience. However, the integration of rodent-based research on the specific neurotransmitter systems that subserve attention with the results from human behavioral and neuroimaging studies has been hampered by the lack of tasks that validly assess attention in both species. To address this issue, an operant sustained attention task that has been extensively used in research … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

9
165
1

Year Published

2013
2013
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
3
3
2

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 105 publications
(175 citation statements)
references
References 52 publications
9
165
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Animals also performed a Sustained Attention Task (SAT) (McGaughy and Sarter, 1995;Demeter et al, 2008Demeter et al, , 2011Demeter et al, , 2013Howe et al, 2013). The present evidence indicates that dual cholinergic-dopaminergic lesions increase the rate of falls in situations requiring the attentional control of complex movements, that attentional impairments and fall propensity are correlated, and that cholinergic deafferentation unmasks the contributions of dorsal striatal dopamine to complex movement, balance, and gait control.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 88%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Animals also performed a Sustained Attention Task (SAT) (McGaughy and Sarter, 1995;Demeter et al, 2008Demeter et al, , 2011Demeter et al, , 2013Howe et al, 2013). The present evidence indicates that dual cholinergic-dopaminergic lesions increase the rate of falls in situations requiring the attentional control of complex movements, that attentional impairments and fall propensity are correlated, and that cholinergic deafferentation unmasks the contributions of dorsal striatal dopamine to complex movement, balance, and gait control.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 88%
“…SAT. Evidence in support of the validity of the SAT, in terms of generating measures of sustained attentional capacity in mice, rats, and humans, has been previously described (McGaughy and Sarter, 1995;Demeter et al, 2008Demeter et al, , 2013. The SAT also taxes the ability to shift between states of perceptual attention and cue-directed behavior (Howe et al, 2013).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Optical stimulation was achieved via a blue laser diode coupled to a fiber optic cable and modulated via a custom written software package to control laser parameters including duration and intensity. Animals underwent a total of 4-6 mo of training of the operant sustained attention task (SAT) (50,51) with the oldest mouse being ∼9 mo old at study conclusion. Once animals achieved performance criterion they were randomly selected to undergo AAV infusions for one of three possible constructs and underwent surgery for optic fiber placement.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Amplitudes did not vary by stimulation duration and the two factors did not interact [main effect of stimulation duration: F(1,29) = 2.90, P = 0.10, duration by power interaction: F(4,116) = 2.07, P = 0.11]. Compared with the shorter stimulation duration, 1,000-ms stimulation generated transients that peaked later [F(1,29) = 94.40, P < 0.001] and required more time to return within 50% of baseline [t 50 ; F(1,29) = 73.32, P < 0.001; Fig. 2E].…”
Section: Significancementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Following these recommendations the CNTRICS panel devised a similar list of tasks for evaluating these cognitive domains in animals (Carter and Barch, 2007). These tasks were selected based on evidence of face, predictive and construct validity relative to the human CPT and each has been reverse-translated back into human tasks (Demeter et al, 2008;Young et al, 2009a;Young et al, 2013b;Worbe et al, 2014). A key issue that was raised throughout this process was the need for greater translational validity between rodent and human tasks (Hagan and Jones, 2005;Young et al, 2009a).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%