2019
DOI: 10.1002/solr.201900004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Rationally Programmable Paper‐Based Artificial Trees Toward Multipath Solar‐Driven Water Extraction from Liquid/Solid Substrates

Abstract: Solar vaporization, which is emerged as a promising candidate for harvesting solar energy in sewage purification and/or seawater desalination, has attracted increasing interests during the last few years. Although tremendous advances are made, it is still challenging to realize simple fabrication protocols, low‐cost, and rationally editable 3D structures toward multipath water extraction from liquid/solid media. Inspired by natural plants with hierarchical structures rooted in soils, herein, an artificial tree… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
15
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 31 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 47 publications
0
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This enables the 3D evaporator to achieve evaporation area index (EAI) values (ratio of the total area available for evaporation relative to the projected ground area) that are greater than 1. Figure A summarizes some 3D geometries that have been reported in the literature, including hierarchical structures that contain microscopic 3D features to increase the EAI to around 1.2, , curved and folded 2D sheets that lead to an increased EAI of around 1.5, 2D sheets that were intentionally converted into 3D geometries to obtain an EAI up to 3 by means of cutting and pasting, and more recently bio-inspired and other 3D evaporator structures that generally result in EAI values of 5 and higher. The evaporative water fluxes of these 3D evaporators were higher than those of most of the 2D counterparts, but they have remained less than 5 kg m –2 h –1 , with only a few 3D evaporators achieving the higher EAI values , that are needed to make this approach attractive in practice.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This enables the 3D evaporator to achieve evaporation area index (EAI) values (ratio of the total area available for evaporation relative to the projected ground area) that are greater than 1. Figure A summarizes some 3D geometries that have been reported in the literature, including hierarchical structures that contain microscopic 3D features to increase the EAI to around 1.2, , curved and folded 2D sheets that lead to an increased EAI of around 1.5, 2D sheets that were intentionally converted into 3D geometries to obtain an EAI up to 3 by means of cutting and pasting, and more recently bio-inspired and other 3D evaporator structures that generally result in EAI values of 5 and higher. The evaporative water fluxes of these 3D evaporators were higher than those of most of the 2D counterparts, but they have remained less than 5 kg m –2 h –1 , with only a few 3D evaporators achieving the higher EAI values , that are needed to make this approach attractive in practice.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[ 29,30 ] In addition, 3D evaporators deliver better SSG performances than those of 2D evaporators because of their larger evaporation area and better thermal management and insulation abilities. [ 31–34 ]…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[29,30] In addition, 3D evaporators deliver better SSG performances than those of 2D evaporators because of their larger evaporation area and better thermal management and insulation abilities. [31][32][33][34] Different evaporators with high evaporation rates and efficiencies under 1 sun illumination have been reported. One method of achieving high evaporation rate and efficiency is material and microstructure design.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, the bottom parts of the 3D structure with lower temperature can gain energy from the environment. As a result, the 3D structure demonstrates a higher evaporation rate than that of the 2D one …”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%