“…However, the Ru II polypyridine complexes reported so far were found to have relatively poor 2P photophysical properties [7, 9a, 12] compared to porphyrins, porphyrin oligomers or expanded porphyrinoids, [13] limiting the application of this technique with these complexes. In this context, we have recently reported the rational design of the complexes [Ru(bipy) n ( L ‐NMe 2 / L ‐OMe) 3− n ] 2+ (bipy=2,2'‐bipyridine, L ‐NMe 2 =( E , E ′)‐4,4'‐bis[ p ‐( N , N ‐dimethylamino)styryl]‐2,2'‐bipyridine, L ‐OMe=( E , E ′)‐4,4'‐bis[ p ‐methoxystyryl]‐2,2'‐bipyridine, n =0, 1, 2, Figure 1) as effective PSs for 1P (540 nm) and 2P (800 nm) PDT [14] . Worthy of note, the use of ( E , E ′)‐4,4'‐bisstyryl‐2,2'‐bipyridine type Ru II polypyridine complexes was previously reported as effective 2P absorbing chromophores [15] .…”