Rationality, Religious Belief, and Shaping Dispositions: Replies to Carruth, Gatley, Levy, Kotzee and Rocha

Tillson, John

doi:10.1007/s11217-021-09809-1

Cited by 2 publications

(1 citation statement)

References 10 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…For example, the form of religious beliefs themselves has been a subject of debate (for an overview, see Barrett, 2022) as scholars have tried to pin down the determining conditions for religious convictions, and how they relate to evidence-based reasoning and/or "blind" faith (Löffler, 2018;Matheson, 2018;McGrath, 2018;Penelhum, 2019;Tillson, 2022).…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

On religious practices as multiscale active inference: Certainties emerging from recurrent interactions within and across individuals and groups

Hipólito¹,

Hesp²

2022

Preprint

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

This chapter takes inspiration from Wittgenstein’s thinking to formulate a non-reductive toolbox associated with generative modelling, specifically as applied in complex adaptive systems theory. It converges on a communal perspective on religion as multiscale active inference that contrasts starkly with common “straw person” perspectives on religion that aim to reduce it to “erroneous” metaphysical theorising motivated by spiritual experiences “generated by the brain”. In contrast, religious practices both enable and require the emergence of implicit (or “ineffable”) meanings that are experienced both individually (i.e., one’s personal faith) and collectively (“the faith”), with only partial commensurability cast under Wittgenstein’s notions of ‘rule-following’ and ‘language games’. We show how the collective and perspectival aspects of religion in enculturation with morals, doctrines, rituals, and expressions can be formalised in terms of deep active inference in multi-agent systems. This approach describes how religions are incommensurable with the scientific method due to the epistemic separation between the different kinds of language games of religious and scientific practices. Touchpoints between these different kinds of language games tend to give rise to perpetual confusion and unproductive discussions. As a particularly impactful example, we discuss ethical considerations in policy-making, which demonstrates how our account can help shed light on complex societal challenges that have emerged at the touchpoints between religion and science.

show abstract

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

On religious practices as multiscale active inference: Certainties emerging from recurrent interactions within and across individuals and groups

Hipólito¹,

Hesp²

2022

Preprint

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

Autonomy, rationality, and religious initiation: replies to Hand, Wareham, Gheaus, Lewin, and Clayton

Tillson

2024

Journal of Philosophy of Education

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

John Tillson concludes the symposium on his Children, Religion and the Ethics of Influence by replying to his five respondents. The reply focusses on Michael Hand’s defence of parental rights to raise their children in their faith; Ruth Wareham’s suggestion that the value of autonomy rules out a wider range of impermissible religious influences than Tillson’s account is able to; David Lewin’s alternative criteria for ethical influence and scepticism about rationality’s objectivity; Anca Gheaus’ proposal that initiation into multiple contradictory religious faiths is permissible; and Matthew Clayton’s rejection of the book’s perfectionist political morality.

show abstract

Rationality, Religious Belief, and Shaping Dispositions: Replies to Carruth, Gatley, Levy, Kotzee and Rocha

Cited by 2 publications

References 10 publications

On religious practices as multiscale active inference: Certainties emerging from recurrent interactions within and across individuals and groups

On religious practices as multiscale active inference: Certainties emerging from recurrent interactions within and across individuals and groups

Autonomy, rationality, and religious initiation: replies to Hand, Wareham, Gheaus, Lewin, and Clayton

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About