2012
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2012.10.007
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Rationale use of unenhanced multi-detector CT (CT KUB) in evaluation of suspected renal colic

Abstract: There is statistically significant difference of yield across specialties. CT KUB as an initial imaging modality for suspected urolithiasis should be ordered in consultation with the urologist and ER physicians. Tool of good history taking and physical examination has proved to be essential steps in algorithm of ordering CT KUB, which can avoid unnecessary radiation exposure.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

1
15
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
1
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In our sample, 10% of women had an alternative diagnosis on low-dose unenhanced CT compared to 5% of men. Although this difference was not statistically significant, it is consistent with previous reports: Nadeem and colleagues reported a higher rate of incidental findings in women, 21 and…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In our sample, 10% of women had an alternative diagnosis on low-dose unenhanced CT compared to 5% of men. Although this difference was not statistically significant, it is consistent with previous reports: Nadeem and colleagues reported a higher rate of incidental findings in women, 21 and…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…Nadeem and colleagues reported that unenhanced CT yielded an incidental diagnosis rate of 18% in studies ordered by emergency physicians. 21 Three retrospective studies reported that the proportion of cases with an alternative diagnosis ranged between 8 and 12%. 19,22,23 The reluctance of physicians to systematically obtain CT scans for suspected uncomplicated renal colic is likely, at least in part, to be due to efforts to limit radiation exposure, particularly in young women.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Previous technologies, including US, necessary X‐ray examination, and plain KUB radiographs, have been demonstrated to be limited by several constraining factors in accurately diagnosing upper urinary tract calculi and in determining the size, composition, amount and position of the calculi, bowel content, obstruction, and infection, etc. . Theoretically, 90% of stones can be found by X‐ray and KUB, however the actual display rate of both have been shown to be lower than actual rates, thereby seriously hindering the diagnosis of calculi .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Frequently, the true prevalence of urinary calculi is underestimated because many calculi remain asymptomatic and hence go undiagnosed . Generally, the great majority of patients with urinary calculi can be diagnosed, to some extent, through medical history, physical examination, ultrasound, or X‐ray examination . However, several factors constraint diagnostic accuracy, including the size, amount and position of the calculi, bowel content of patient, obstruction and infection, as well as calculi composition, etc.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…DOI: 10.18410/jebmh/2019/354 BACKGROUND Renal stones are very common, affecting 12% of the population at some point of time in their life. 1,2 The most common type of stone is calcium oxalate (60-80%). 3 The aetiology of formation is largely unknown.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%