2000
DOI: 10.1046/j.1537-2995.2000.40030389.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Rationale for universal WBC reduction of blood components?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2001
2001
2008
2008

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Prestorage WBC reduction of cellular blood components removes donor WBCs before they undergo apoptosis or necrosis and before they release breakdown products at 4°C or cytokines at room temperature. Furthermore, although adverse transfusion reactions have been associated with the use of WBC‐reduction filters, 5–7 the FDA recently concluded that, “aside from specific device (filter) failures, there are no clinically significant adverse effects associated with leukocyte reduction.” 4 In fact, the reported severe hypotensive reactions to WBC‐reduced blood components have been associated only with the transfusion of blood components filtered at the bedside 8 . These reactions are attrib uted to the generation of bradykinin and, possibly, other vasodilators, as donor plasma passes over the filter media 9,10 .…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Prestorage WBC reduction of cellular blood components removes donor WBCs before they undergo apoptosis or necrosis and before they release breakdown products at 4°C or cytokines at room temperature. Furthermore, although adverse transfusion reactions have been associated with the use of WBC‐reduction filters, 5–7 the FDA recently concluded that, “aside from specific device (filter) failures, there are no clinically significant adverse effects associated with leukocyte reduction.” 4 In fact, the reported severe hypotensive reactions to WBC‐reduced blood components have been associated only with the transfusion of blood components filtered at the bedside 8 . These reactions are attrib uted to the generation of bradykinin and, possibly, other vasodilators, as donor plasma passes over the filter media 9,10 .…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Leucodepletion of blood components has had a chequered history, even though the process of prestorage leucodepletion is almost risk‐free (Blajchman, 1999). There is controversy about the appropriate application and cost of this technology (Dzik et al ., 2000; Pittman, 2000; Thurer et al ., 2000). The debate whether to adopt selective or universal leucodepletion predates the outbreak of variant Creutzfeldt–Jakob disease (vCJD).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It has been suggested that the use of γ-irradiation will decreases transfusion-transmitted CMV infection by mounting an immune response via indirect prevention of T-lymphocyte proliferation (25, 26) and the use of γ-irradiated blood products in newborn infants has been strongly suggested (27). We found a CMV infection rate of 2/20 (10%) using relatively fresh nonirradiated-nonfiltered blood in comparison to the previously reported 1/19 (5%) (10) using irradiated-nonfiltered seropositive blood.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%