2005
DOI: 10.1080/03069880500132581
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Rationale and development of a general population well-being measure: Psychometric status of the GP-CORE in a student sample

Abstract: This paper presents the rationale, development, and psychometric status of a non-clinical self-report measure for the general population (GP) Á/ including students Á/ derived from the Clinical Outcomes in Routine Evaluation-Outcome Measure (CORE-OM) and hence termed the GP-CORE. In contrast to the CORE-OM, the GP-CORE does not comprise items denoting highintensity of presenting problems or risk and thereby increases its acceptability in a non-clinical population. Uniquely, over half the items in the GP-CORE ar… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
37
0
1

Year Published

2010
2010
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

3
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 65 publications
(38 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
0
37
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Clinical Outcomes Routine Evaluation-General Population Version (CORE-GP) (Sinclair et al 2005): This is a 14 item measure of global mental health with questions such as ‘I have felt optimistic about my future’ and ‘I have felt tense, nervous or unhappy’. In the current sample α at time 1 = .90.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Clinical Outcomes Routine Evaluation-General Population Version (CORE-GP) (Sinclair et al 2005): This is a 14 item measure of global mental health with questions such as ‘I have felt optimistic about my future’ and ‘I have felt tense, nervous or unhappy’. In the current sample α at time 1 = .90.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In order to sample a relevant population-those experiencing clinical levels of psychological distress and who therefore may benefit from seeking services-we retained only those participants (n = 198) from a larger sample (N = 518) who met the published clinical cutoff scores for undergraduate student men (1.49) and women (1.63) on the GP-CORE (Evans et al, 2005). We then removed data from one participant who was missing substantial data (i.e., more than 20% of all items).…”
Section: Preliminary Data Screeningmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…General Population-Clinical Outcomes in Routine Evaluation measure (GP-CORE;Evans, Connell, Audin, Sinclair, & Barkham, 2005). The GP-CORE was adapted for use outside of clinical settings from the widely used CORE-Outcome Measure (CORE-OM;Evans et al, 2000) and covers the domains of well-being, problems/symptoms, and functioning.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…-Clinical Outcomes Routine Evaluation General Population Version (CORE-GP) (Evans, et al, 2005): A 14 item measure of well-being and general mental health (α=.90).…”
Section: Standardised Measuresmentioning
confidence: 99%