Rationale and design of the ADDITION-Leicester study, a systematic screening programme and Randomised Controlled Trial of multi-factorial cardiovascular risk intervention in people with Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus detected by screening
Abstract:BackgroundEarlier diagnosis followed by multi-factorial cardiovascular risk intervention may improve outcomes in Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus (T2DM). Latent phase identification through screening requires structured, appropriately targeted population-based approaches. Providers responsible for implementing screening policy await evidence of clinical and cost effectiveness from randomised intervention trials in screen-detected T2DM cases. UK South Asians are at particularly high risk of abnormal glucose tolerance a… Show more
“…The biochemical, anthropometric and demographic variables used in the present analyses were measured during the screening visit (14)(15)(16) . The primary outcome variable was type 2 diabetes diagnosed using the WHO 2011 guidelines as fasting glucose ≥7·0 mmol/l, 2 h glucose ≥11·1 mmol/l or glycated Hb (HbA1c) ≥6·5 % (48 mmol/ mol) (18) .…”
Objective: We investigated whether a higher number of fast-food outlets in an individual's home neighbourhood is associated with increased prevalence of type 2 diabetes mellitus and related risk factors, including obesity. Design: Cross-sectional study. Setting: Three UK-based diabetes screening studies (one general population, two high-risk populations) conducted between 2004 and 2011. The primary outcome was screen-detected type 2 diabetes. Secondary outcomes were risk factors for type 2 diabetes. Subjects: In total 10 461 participants (mean age 59 years; 53 % male; 21 % nonWhite ethnicity).Results: There was a higher number of neighbourhood (500 m radius from home postcode) fast-food outlets among non-White ethnic groups (P < 0·001) and in socially deprived areas (P < 0·001). After adjustment (social deprivation, urban/ rural, ethnicity, age, sex), more fast-food outlets was associated with significantly increased odds for diabetes (OR = 1·02; 95 % CI 1·00, 1·04) and obesity (OR = 1·02; 95 % CI 1·00, 1·03). This suggests that for every additional two outlets per neighbourhood, we would expect one additional diabetes case, assuming a causal relationship between the fast-food outlets and diabetes. Conclusions: These results suggest that increased exposure to fast-food outlets is associated with increased risk of type 2 diabetes and obesity, which has implications for diabetes prevention at a public health level and for those granting planning permission to new fast-food outlets.
“…The biochemical, anthropometric and demographic variables used in the present analyses were measured during the screening visit (14)(15)(16) . The primary outcome variable was type 2 diabetes diagnosed using the WHO 2011 guidelines as fasting glucose ≥7·0 mmol/l, 2 h glucose ≥11·1 mmol/l or glycated Hb (HbA1c) ≥6·5 % (48 mmol/ mol) (18) .…”
Objective: We investigated whether a higher number of fast-food outlets in an individual's home neighbourhood is associated with increased prevalence of type 2 diabetes mellitus and related risk factors, including obesity. Design: Cross-sectional study. Setting: Three UK-based diabetes screening studies (one general population, two high-risk populations) conducted between 2004 and 2011. The primary outcome was screen-detected type 2 diabetes. Secondary outcomes were risk factors for type 2 diabetes. Subjects: In total 10 461 participants (mean age 59 years; 53 % male; 21 % nonWhite ethnicity).Results: There was a higher number of neighbourhood (500 m radius from home postcode) fast-food outlets among non-White ethnic groups (P < 0·001) and in socially deprived areas (P < 0·001). After adjustment (social deprivation, urban/ rural, ethnicity, age, sex), more fast-food outlets was associated with significantly increased odds for diabetes (OR = 1·02; 95 % CI 1·00, 1·04) and obesity (OR = 1·02; 95 % CI 1·00, 1·03). This suggests that for every additional two outlets per neighbourhood, we would expect one additional diabetes case, assuming a causal relationship between the fast-food outlets and diabetes. Conclusions: These results suggest that increased exposure to fast-food outlets is associated with increased risk of type 2 diabetes and obesity, which has implications for diabetes prevention at a public health level and for those granting planning permission to new fast-food outlets.
“…Volunteers were recruited from a population-based screening programme for diabetes mellitus [29,30]. ADDITIONEurope (Anglo-Danish-Dutch Trial of Intensive Treatment in Screen-Detected Diabetes) is a prospective intervention trial of multifactorial cardiovascular risk management in people with screen-detected type 2 diabetes with a primary endpoint of 5 year macrovascular events [31].…”
Section: Study Populationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…ADDITIONEurope (Anglo-Danish-Dutch Trial of Intensive Treatment in Screen-Detected Diabetes) is a prospective intervention trial of multifactorial cardiovascular risk management in people with screen-detected type 2 diabetes with a primary endpoint of 5 year macrovascular events [31]. As one of the UK arms, ADDITION-Leicester [29,30] cf PWV measurements Two operators (DRW and RS) blinded to glucose status performed all arterial measurements within a single-site research facility at a university teaching hospital. A standard protocol ensured participants were fasted and rested supine prior to cf PWV assessment.…”
Aims/hypothesis Non-invasive measures of aortic stiffness reflect vascular senescence and predict outcome in diabetes. Glucose-mediated elastic artery sclerosis may play an integral role in the development of macrovascular complications. We used carotid-femoral pulse wave velocity ( cf PWV) to quantify independent associations of fasting glucose, post-challenge glucose and derived insulin resistance (HOMA-IR) with aortic stiffness. Methods cf PWV was measured using a 4 MHz continuous wave Doppler ultrasound probe within groups with newly identified age-and sex-matched normal glucose metabolism (NGM), impaired glucose regulation (IGR) and diabetes mellitus populations (n=570, mean age 59.1, 56% male). Results After multivariate adjustment, IGR and diabetes were associated with significant aortic stiffening compared with NGM (adjusted cf PWV±SE: NGM, 9.15±0.12 m/s; IGR 9.76±0.11 m/s, p<0.001; diabetes, 9.89±0.12 m/s, p< 0.001). IGR stratification indicated that impaired fasting glucose (IFG; 9.71±0.12 m/s) and post-challenge (impaired glucose tolerance; 9.82±0.24 m/s) categories had similar cf PWV (p=0.83). Modelled predictors of cf PWV were used to assess independent metabolic associations with arterial stiffness. Fasting glucose concentration (β=0.10; 95% CI 0.05, 0.18; p=0.003), 2 h post-challenge glucose (β=0.14; 95% CI 0.02, 0.23; p<0.001) and HOMA-IR (β=0.20, 95% CI 0.05, 0.53; p<0.001) were independently related to cf PWV after adjustment for age, sex, mean arterial pressure, heart rate, body mass index, renal function and antihypertensive medication. Conclusions/interpretation IGR characterised by fasting or post-challenge hyperglycaemia is associated with significant vascular stiffening. Post-challenge glucose and HOMA-IR are the most powerful metabolic predictors of arterial stiffness, implying hyperglycaemic excursion and insulin resistance play important roles in the pathogenesis of arteriosclerosis.
“…The response rates and prevalences were compared with those found in the Anglo-Danish-Dutch Study of Intensive Treatment in People with Screen Detected Diabetes in Primary Care (ADDITION)-Leicester study [13]. ADDITIONLeicester used a population-based screening approach in the same locality as LPD and WAD.…”
Aims/hypothesis The Leicester Practice Risk Score (LPRS) is a tool for identifying those at high risk of either impaired glucose regulation (IGR), defined as impaired glucose tolerance and/or impaired fasting glucose, or type 2 diabetes from routine primary care data. The aim of this study was to determine the yield from the LPRS when applied in two diabetes prevention trials. Methods Let's Prevent Diabetes (LPD) and Walking Away from Diabetes (WAD) studies used the LPRS to identify people at risk of IGR or type 2 diabetes from 54 general practices. The top 10% at risk within each practice were invited for screening using a 75 g OGTT. The response rate to the invitation and the prevalence of IGR and/or type 2 diabetes in each study were calculated. Results Of those invited 19.2% (n 03,449) in LPD and 22.1% (n0833) in WAD attended. Of those screened for LPD 25.5% (95% CI 24.1, 27.0) had IGR and 4.5% (95% CI 3.8, 5.2) had type 2 diabetes, giving a prevalence of any abnormal glucose tolerance of 30.1% (95% CI 28.5, 31.6). Comparable rates were seen for the WAD study: IGR 26.5% (95% CI 23.5, 29.5), type 2 diabetes 3.0% (95% CI 1.8, 4.2) and IGR/type 2 diabetes 29.5% (95% CI 26.4, 32.6). Conclusions/interpretation Using the LPRS identifies a high yield of people with abnormal glucose tolerance, significantly higher than those seen in a population screening programme in the same locality. The LPRS is an inexpensive and simple way of targeting screening programmes at those with the highest risk.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.