2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.critrevonc.2020.103044
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Rational use of 18F-FDG PET/CT in patients with advanced cutaneous melanoma: A systematic review

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
28
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 35 publications
(33 citation statements)
references
References 125 publications
2
28
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The role of volumetric parameters in FDG-PET/CT as a predictive biomarker has been demonstrated in different types of cancers [5,[13][14][15][16][17]. The total metabolic tumor volume is a valuable parameter as it reflects the extent and activity of the tumor [18][19][20]. In this study, we calculated the TMTV in follow-up FDG-PET/CT 2-4 and 5-6 months after baseline PET/CT in patients with an advanced melanoma treated with Pembrolizumab.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The role of volumetric parameters in FDG-PET/CT as a predictive biomarker has been demonstrated in different types of cancers [5,[13][14][15][16][17]. The total metabolic tumor volume is a valuable parameter as it reflects the extent and activity of the tumor [18][19][20]. In this study, we calculated the TMTV in follow-up FDG-PET/CT 2-4 and 5-6 months after baseline PET/CT in patients with an advanced melanoma treated with Pembrolizumab.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The first one is the search for other biomarker definitions accounting for the location of highest metabolic activity. Second, it would be interesting to test our findings in other tumor histologies, such as lymphoma or melanoma (58,59). PET is a mainstream technique, increasingly employed in clinics and in many…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Although treatments do not influence baseline MATV measurements or correlations among the segmentation methods, the associations with survival might change. Furthermore, in the standard of care PET/CT acquisition a non-contrast-enhanced low-dose CT is obtained, which has a lower sensitivity than PET combined with contrast-enhanced CT for most metastatic locations [ 22 ]. Although this can have implications for lesion detection and management in specific clinical cases, it is highly unlikely that the PET-based MATV segmentations will change by non-contrast-enhanced vs. contrast-enhanced CT.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In brief, all adult patients with histologically proven cutaneous or mucosal metastatic melanoma (American Joint Committee on Cancer [AJCC] [10] 7th edition stage IV melanoma) without prior systemic treatment and with a baseline 18 F-FDG PET/CT scan performed between May 2014 and December 2015 with PET-positive lesions were included in the cohort. Patients also underwent a baseline contrast-enhanced diagnostic CT scan around the time of PET/CT scanning [22]. Patient and tumour characteristics were retrieved retrospectively from the electronic patient files (see Table 1 in [13] or Supplemental Table 1 for a modified version).…”
Section: Patient Populationmentioning
confidence: 99%